WHITACRE SPINAL NEEDLE ADVERSE REPORTS
1.
|
BRAND NAME |
BD WHITACRE NEEDLE |
||||
|
TYPE OF DEVICE |
27G X 4 11/16 LONG WHITACRE SPINAL NEEDLE |
||||
|
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
LONG LENGTH WHITACRE PENCIL POINT SPINAL NEEDLES |
||||
|
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
SPINAL NEEDLE |
||||
|
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
409443 |
||||
|
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
SPINAL NEEDLES & SPINAL NEEDLE INTRODUCERS |
||||
|
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
|
IS BASELINE 510(K) NUMBER PROVIDED? |
NO |
||||
|
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
YES |
||||
|
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
|
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
|
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
NA |
||||
|
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
01/01/1964 |
||||
|
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
|
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
|
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
|
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
421015 |
||||
|
MDR REPORT KEY |
432036 |
||||
|
EVENT KEY |
408766 |
||||
|
REPORT NUMBER |
2618282-2002-00007 |
||||
|
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
|
PRODUCT CODE |
BSP |
||||
|
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
|
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
|
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
|
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
|
REPORT DATE |
12/09/2002 |
||||
|
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
|
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
|
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
12/09/2002 |
||||
|
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
|
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
|
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
|
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
409443 |
||||
|
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
9906958 |
||||
|
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
|
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
NO |
||||
|
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
|
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
11/12/2002 |
||||
|
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
|
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
03/01/1999 |
||||
|
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
|
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
INITIAL |
||||
|
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
|
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
|
REPORT DATE: 12/09/2002 MDR TEXT KEY: 1499698 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
|
WHEN INSERTING THE WHITACRE SPINAL NEEDLE INTO A PATIENT, THE NEEDLE BROKE OFF. THE NEEDLE THEN HAD TO BE SURGICALLY REMOVED. |
2.
|
BRAND NAME |
BECTON DICKINSON WHITACRE SPINAL NEEDLE |
|||
|
TYPE OF DEVICE |
SPINAL NEEDLE 27 GA 3-1/2" |
|||
|
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
|||
|
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
410964 |
|||
|
MDR REPORT KEY |
421912 |
|||
|
EVENT KEY |
399043 |
|||
|
REPORT NUMBER |
421912 |
|||
|
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
|||
|
PRODUCT CODE |
BSP |
|||
|
REPORT SOURCE |
VOLUNTARY |
|||
|
REPORT DATE |
10/09/2002 |
|||
|
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
|
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
|
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
10/09/2002 |
|||
|
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
NO |
|||
|
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
YES |
|||
|
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
|||
|
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
0111989 |
|||
|
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO ANSWER PROVIDED |
|||
|
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
|
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
|
REPORT DATE: 10/09/2002 MDR TEXT KEY: 1464432 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
|
BECTON-DICKINSON WHITACRE 27 GAUGE 3-1/2" SPINAL NEEDLES, LOT # 0111989 HAS A DEFECT. NORMALLY IT IS POSSIBLE, EASILY, TO REPLACE THE STYLET WITHIN THE NEEDLE. THE AFOREMENTIONED LOT NUMBER HAS A "RIDGE" WITHIN WHAT SHOULD BE A SMOOTH FUNNEL-SHAPED AREA IN THE NUB OF THE OUTER CANNULA SO THAT THE STYLET MUST BE VERY PRECISELY CENTERED IN ORDER TO BE RE-THREADED WITHIN THE OUTER CANNULA. THIS CAUSES UNNECESSARY DELAY AND PT DISCOMFORT. |
3.
|
BRAND NAME |
SPINAL 27G WHITACRE |
|||||
|
TYPE OF DEVICE |
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA TRAY |
|||||
|
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
SPINAL 27G WHITCARE |
|||||
|
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
ADMINISTRATION SET |
|||||
|
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
15646 |
|||||
|
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
SET, ADM, INTRAVASCULAR |
|||||
|
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
* |
|||||
|
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
|||||
|
IS BASELINE 510(K) NUMBER PROVIDED? |
NO |
|||||
|
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
|||||
|
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
|||||
|
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
|||||
|
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
05/01/1993 |
|||||
|
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
|||||
|
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
|||||
|
MANUFACTURER (Section G) |
|
|||||
|
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
|||||
|
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
351911 |
|||||
|
MDR REPORT KEY |
362773 |
|||||
|
EVENT KEY |
342026 |
|||||
|
REPORT NUMBER |
1018381-2001-00105 |
|||||
|
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
|||||
|
PRODUCT CODE |
FPA |
|||||
|
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
|||||
|
SOURCE TYPE |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL,COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE |
|||||
|
EVENT TYPE |
MALFUNCTION |
|||||
|
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
|||||
|
REPORT DATE |
10/24/2001 |
|||||
|
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||||
|
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||||
|
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
11/23/2001 |
|||||
|
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
NO |
|||||
|
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
YES |
|||||
|
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
|||||
|
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
05/01/2002 |
|||||
|
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
15646 |
|||||
|
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
78-930-Z1 |
|||||
|
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
|||||
|
DATE RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
10/29/2001 |
|||||
|
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
|||||
|
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
|||||
|
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
10/24/2001 |
|||||
|
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
NO |
|||||
|
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
06/01/2001 |
|||||
|
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
|||||
|
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
INITIAL |
|||||
|
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
|
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
|
REPORT DATE: 10/24/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1260558 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
|
GENERAL REPORT REC'D OF AN UNDOCUMENTED NUMBER OF UNDOCUMENTED INCIDENTS OF A LEAK OCCURRING BETWEEN THE SPINAL NEEDLE HUB AND THE GLASS SYRINGE. THE CUSTOMER REPORTS THAT THIS HAS BEEN OCCURRING ON SURGICAL PATIENTS THAT ARE TO RECEIVE A SPINAL ANESTHETIC. THE SPINAL NEEDLES HAVE BEEN INSERTED WITHOUT PROBLEM. THE CUSTOMER REPORTS THAT THE APPEARANCE OF THE NEEDLES AND SYRINGES DOES NOT SEEM DIFFERENT. STATES THAT WHEN THE SYRINGE IS CONNECTED TO THE HUB OF THE NEEDLE, WITH THE FIRST ATTEMPT TO INJECT THE MEDICATION, THERE IS LEAKAGE OCCURRING IMMEDIATELY. THE LEAK HAS HAPPENED WITH VARIOUS MEDICATIONS. THE PHYSICIANS HAVE TRIED DIFFERENT SYRINGES, BUT THE LEAKGE HAS CONTINUED TO OCCUR. THE AMOUNT OF LEAKAGE VARIES. REPORT SOURCE STATES THAT SOME OF THE PATIENTS DO GET THE EFFECT OF THE ANESTHETIC AND SOME OF THE PATIENTS HAVE NOT ACHIEVED THE ANESTHETIC EFFECT AND THEN REQUIRE GENERAL ANESTHETIC. THERE ARE NO REPORTS OF THE PATIENTS HAVING HAD DIFFICULTIES COMING OUT OF THE GENERAL ANESTHETIC. THERE IS NO REPORT OF ADVERSE PATIENT EVENTS. ADDITIONAL PATIENT INFO WAS REQUESTED, BUT NO FURTHER INFO IS AVAILABLE. |
|
|
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
|
REPORT DATE: 10/24/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1260561 |
|
THE SAMPLE WAS REC'D FOR TESTING AND INVESTIGATION ON 10/29/2001. TESTING IS NOT COMPLETE. |
4.
|
BRAND NAME |
BD WHITACRE NEEDLE |
||||
|
TYPE OF DEVICE |
25G TW X 3 1/2" WHITACRE SPINAL NEEDLE, BNS |
||||
|
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
WHITACRE PENCIL POINT SPINAL NEEDLES,BNS |
||||
|
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
SPINAL NEEDLE |
||||
|
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
400621 |
||||
|
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
SPINAL NEEDLES |
||||
|
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
|
IS BASELINE 510(K) NUMBER PROVIDED? |
NO |
||||
|
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
YES |
||||
|
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
|
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
|
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
NA |
||||
|
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
01/01/1964 |
||||
|
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
|
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
|
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
|
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
342872 |
||||
|
MDR REPORT KEY |
353656 |
||||
|
EVENT KEY |
333201 |
||||
|
REPORT NUMBER |
2618282-2001-00012 |
||||
|
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
|
PRODUCT CODE |
BSP |
||||
|
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
|
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
|
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
|
REPORT DATE |
09/28/2001 |
||||
|
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
|
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
|
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
09/28/2001 |
||||
|
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
|
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
|
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
|
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
400621 |
||||
|
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
YES |
||||
|
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
|
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
|
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
09/04/2001 |
||||
|
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
YES |
||||
|
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
|
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
INITIAL |
||||
|
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
|
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
|
REPORT DATE: 09/28/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1228166 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
|
SPINAL NEEDLE BROKE FOLLOWING A CESAREAN SECTION. BROKEN FRAGMENT WAS RETRIEVED SURGICALLY WITH PATIENT UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA. BOTH THE CESAREAN SECTION PROCEDURE AND NEEDLE FRAGMENT RETRIEVAL WERE SUCCESSFUL. |
|
|
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
|
REPORT DATE: 09/28/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1228169 |
|
BD QUALITY/REGULATORY SYSTEMS HAS EVALUATED THE REPORT AND SAMPLES. THE CONDITION REPORTED HAS BEEN CONFIRMED BASED ON THE ACTUAL SAMPLE RETURNED. THE SAMPLE WAS FORWARDED TO THE MICROSCOPY LABORATORY FOR EXAMINATION. OBSERVATION OF THE SAMPLE IN THE "AS RECEIVED" CONDITION WAS PERFORMED WITH A LOW POWER OPTICAL MICROSCOPE AND REPRESENTATIVE IMAGES WERE RECORDED [OPTICAL PHOTOS 1-7]. NOTE THAT THERE WAS ALSO EVIDENCE OF A SECOND BEND IN THE CANNULA [OPTICAL PHOTO 3]. FURTHERMORE DETAILED EXAMINATION OF THIS SAMPLE WAS PERFORMED BY SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE [SEM] IN ORDER TO CONFIRM THE FINDING OF BENDING AS A MODE OF FAILURE FOR THIS SAMPLE. A FEW IMPORTANT OBSERVATIONS WERE MADE AT THIS POINT IN THE ANALYSIS WHICH ARE RELEVANT TO IDENTIFICATION OF THIS NEEDLE FAILURE AS A "BENDING" TYPE, THESE ARE: 1. - TUBING OVALITY. IS A DEFORMATION OF THE TUBING FROM CIRCULAR CROSS-SECTIONAL SHAPE TO AN OVAL CROSS-SECTIONAL SHAPE. THIS OCCURS WHEN A RIGID TUBE IS BENT TO SOME DEGREE AWAY FROM ITS NORMAL POSITION. 2. - DEGREE OF BEND AT THE POINT OF FRACTURE. IN SEM PHOTOS 3 & 8, IT IS CLEARLY VISIBLE THAT THE NEEDLE IN THE HUB SHOWS SIGNS OF ANGULARITY, WHICH IS AN INDICATION THAT THE NEEDLE WAS BENT. 3. - MICROVOID COALESCENCE, OR DIMPLING. THIS IS AN IDENTIFYING CHARACTERISTIC OF A DUCTILE FAILURE, AND OCCURS AT A POINT OF MATERIAL SEPARATION. IT WAS CONCLUDED THAT THE MICROSCOPIC EVALUATION OF THIS SAMPLE CLEARLY EXHIBITS THE FOLLOWING ATTRIBUTES: 1. TUBING OVALITY IS CLEARLY EVIDENT. 2. A SECOND BEND OF THE CANNULA IS CLEARLY VISIBLE. 3. MICROVOID COALESCENCE, EVIDENCE OF TENSILE FAILURE OF THE STEEL IS PRESENT. 4. EVIDENCE OF A RESIDUAL BEND IS EXHIBITED AT THE FRACTURE SURFACE. THESE OBSERVATIONS, WHEN VIEWED IN CONTEXT TOGETHER, ARE RELIABLE INDICATORS THAT THE SUBJECT NEEDLE HAS BEEN BENT, THIS LEADING TO FAILURE OF THE NEEDLE. BASED ON THIS ANALYSIS IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE BREAKAGE OF THIS NEEDLE DID NOT RESULT FROM ANY MANUFACTURING DEFECT AND THEREFORE NO CORRECTIVE ACTION IS REQUIRED. |
5.
|
BRAND NAME |
WHITACRE SPINAL NEEDLE |
||||
|
TYPE OF DEVICE |
25 X 3 1/2" SPINAL NEEDLE |
||||
|
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
WHITACRE HIGH FLOW PENCIL POINT SPINAL NEEDLE STERILE, SINGLE USE |
||||
|
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
SPINAL NEEDLE |
||||
|
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
405138 |
||||
|
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
SPINAL NEEDLES |
||||
|
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
|
IS BASELINE 510(K) NUMBER PROVIDED? |
NO |
||||
|
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
YES |
||||
|
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
|
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
|
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
NA |
||||
|
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
01/01/1964 |
||||
|
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
|
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
|
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
|
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
256150 |
||||
|
MDR REPORT KEY |
264597 |
||||
|
EVENT KEY |
247995 |
||||
|
REPORT NUMBER |
2618282-2000-00002 |
||||
|
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
|
PRODUCT CODE |
BSP |
||||
|
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
|
SOURCE TYPE |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL,USER FACILITY |
||||
|
EVENT TYPE |
MALFUNCTION |
||||
|
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
|
REPORT DATE |
02/22/2000 |
||||
|
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
|
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
|
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
02/22/2000 |
||||
|
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
|
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
|
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
|
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
405138 |
||||
|
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
|
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
|
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
|
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
02/07/2000 |
||||
|
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
|
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
|
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
|
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
|
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
|
REPORT DATE: 02/22/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 900185 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
|
NEEDLE BROKE OFF IN PT WHILE PERFORMING SPINAL ANESTHESIA, BROKEN END WILL BE SURGICALLY REMOVED. NEEDLE FORWARDED TO HOSPITAL RISK MANAGEMENT-NOT RELEASED. |
|
|
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
|
REPORT DATE: 02/22/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 900188 |
|
DEVICE NOT RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. |
6.
|
BRAND NAME |
WHITACRE NEEDLE |
||||
|
TYPE OF DEVICE |
SPINAL NEEDLE |
||||
|
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
WHITACRE PENCIL POINT SPINAL NEEDLES,BNS |
||||
|
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
SPINAL NEEDLE |
||||
|
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
400600 |
||||
|
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
SPINAL NEEDLES |
||||
|
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
|
IS BASELINE 510(K) NUMBER PROVIDED? |
NO |
||||
|
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
YES |
||||
|
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
|
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
|
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
NA |
||||
|
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
01/01/1964 |
||||
|
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
|
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
|
MANUFACTURER (Section G) |
|
||||
|
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
|
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
230065 |
||||
|
MDR REPORT KEY |
237409 |
||||
|
EVENT KEY |
222752 |
||||
|
REPORT NUMBER |
2618282-1999-00009 |
||||
|
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
|
PRODUCT CODE |
BSP |
||||
|
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
|
SOURCE TYPE |
FOREIGN,HEALTH PROFESSIONAL,COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE |
||||
|
EVENT TYPE |
MALFUNCTION |
||||
|
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
|
REPORT DATE |
08/18/1999 |
||||
|
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
|
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
|
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
08/24/1999 |
||||
|
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
|
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
|
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
|
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
400600 |
||||
|
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
7H707 |
||||
|
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
|
DATE RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
08/10/1999 |
||||
|
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
|
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
|
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
08/10/1999 |
||||
|
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
YES |
||||
|
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
08/01/1997 |
||||
|
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
|
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
INVALID DATA |
||||
|
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
|
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
|
REPORT DATE: 08/18/1999 MDR TEXT KEY: 796833 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
|
DURING A SPINAL BIRTHING PROCEDURE, WHILE THE PHYSICIAN WAS INTRODUCING THE NEEDLE, AN INVOLUNTARY MOVEMENT BY THE PT CAUSED THE NEEDLE TO PULL OUT. IT WAS THEN THAT THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED THE NEEDLE HAD BROKEN. ADDITIONAL SURGERY WAS REQUIRED TO REMOVE THE BROKEN END. THE PT WAS NOT HARMED BY THE ADDITIONAL PROCEDURE. |
|
|
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
|
REPORT DATE: 08/24/1999 MDR TEXT KEY: 796834 |
|
BECTON DICKINSON ANESTHESIA SYSTEMS HAS EVALUATED THE REPORT AND SAMPLES. THE SPINAL CANNULA IS BENT AND BROKE, POSSIBLY DUE TO HITTING AN OBSTRUCTION AND APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN BENT AND RESTRAIGHTENED DURING REMOVAL. NORMALLY IF AN OBSTRUCTION IS HIT, THE NEEDLE AND THE INTRODUCER SHOULD BE REMOVED AS ONE, THUS ELIMINATING BENDING AND RESTRAIGHTENING. PT INVOLVEMENT MAY ALSO HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE FAILURE OF THE NEEDLE CANNULA. A CLOSE ANALYSIS BY SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY SUPPORTS NEEDLE FAILURE DUE TO BENDING, RESTRAIGHTENING AND A FINAL TWIST. A COPY OF THE LABRATORY REPORT AND PHOTOS IS ATTACHED. SINCE ADDITIONAL SURGERY WAS REQUIRED TO REMOVE THE BROKEN END OF THE NEEDLE, AN MDR HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE U.S. FDA. A REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORDS DID NOT REVEAL ANY DIFFICULTY DURING MFG. THE RETENTION SAMPLES WERE ALSO REVIEWED AND FOUND ACCEPTABLE. NO FURTHER ACTION IS EMINENT. |
7.
|
BRAND NAME |
25G WHITACRE NEEDLE SPINAL TRAY |
||||
|
TYPE OF DEVICE |
ANESTHETIC CONDUCTION KIT |
||||
|
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
|
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
|
MANUFACTURER (Section G) |
|
||||
|
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
223217 |
||||
|
MDR REPORT KEY |
230161 |
||||
|
EVENT KEY |
216062 |
||||
|
REPORT NUMBER |
1217052-1999-00023 |
||||
|
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
|
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
|
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
|
SOURCE TYPE |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
|
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
|
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
|
REPORT DATE |
06/08/1999 |
||||
|
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
|
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
|
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
07/06/1999 |
||||
|
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
|
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
YES |
||||
|
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
|
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
06/01/2000 |
||||
|
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
4965-25 |
||||
|
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
812177 |
||||
|
OTHER DEVICE ID NUMBER |
NE039 |
||||
|
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
YES |
||||
|
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
|
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
|
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
06/08/1999 |
||||
|
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
|
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
12/01/1998 |
||||
|
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
|
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
INITIAL |
||||
|
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
|
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
|
REPORT DATE: 06/08/1999 MDR TEXT KEY: 767926 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
|
THE INTRODUCER NEEDLE HUB DETACHED FROM THE SHAFT REQUIRING SURGICAL REMOVAL. |
|
|
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
|
REPORT DATE: 07/06/1999 MDR TEXT KEY: 767929 |
|
NI ENTRY THROUGHOUT THIS REPORT: SIMS HAS CONTACTED THE RISK MGR AT THE USER FACILITY TO OBTAIN THIS INFO. H.6. EVALUATION CODES: (OTHER): SIMS IS ANTICIPATING THE HUB OF THIS NEEDLE WILL BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. SIMS DOES NOT HAVE ANY OF THIS SUSPECT NEEDLE LOT INVENTORY. SIMS HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY SIMILAR REPORTS ON THIS NEEDLE LOT NUMBER FROM ANY OTHER USER. |
8.
|
BRAND NAME |
BECTON DICKINSON WHITACRE SPINAL NEEDLE |
|
TYPE OF DEVICE |
SPINAL NEEDLE |
|
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
WHITACRE HIGH FLOW PENCIL POINT SPINAL NEEDLE STERILE, SINGLE USE |
|
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
SPINAL NEEDLE |
|
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
405138 |
|
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
SPINAL NEEDLES |
|
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
|
IS BASELINE 510(K) NUMBER PROVIDED? |
NO |
|
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
YES |
|
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
|
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
|
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
NA |
|
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
01/01/1964 |
|
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |