B. BRAUN PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY ADVERSE REPORTS
1.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAYS |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332229 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE17TKCD |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL KIT |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K840179 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
02/24/1984 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
422769 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
433826 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
410502 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2002-00071 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
12/09/2002 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
12/16/2002 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE17TKCD |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332212 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
11/06/2002 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
11/20/2002 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 12/09/2002 MDR TEXT KEY: 1505753 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
EVENT AS REPORTED BY THE USER FACILITY: "DURING REMOVAL OF EPIDURAL CATHETER, PORTION OF CATHETER STAYED IN PT. VERIFIED BY XRAY." |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 12/09/2002 MDR TEXT KEY: 1505756 |
THE ACTUAL SAMPLE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR THE MFR TO EVALUATE. WITHOUT THE SAMPLE, A COMPLETE EVALUATION COULD NOT BE PERFORMED. BASED ON THE INFO PROVIDED, NO SPECIFIC CONCLUSIONS CAN BE DRAWN. |
2.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL KIT |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332086 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE17TKF |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL KIT |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K840179 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
02/24/1984 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
418446 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
429440 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
406258 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2002-00064 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
11/14/2002 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
11/22/2002 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
04/30/2003 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE17TKF |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332086 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60317566 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
YES |
||||
DATE RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
11/05/2002 |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
10/16/2002 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
10/24/2002 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
YES |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 11/14/2002 MDR TEXT KEY: 1490435 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
WHEN PLASTIC STYLET WAS REMOVED FROM EPIDURAL NEEDLE, THE TIP OF THE STYLET SHEARED OFF AND REMAINED IN PATIENT. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 11/14/2002 MDR TEXT KEY: 1490438 |
ONE USED TUOHY NEEDLE WAS RETURNED FOR EVVALUATION. THE STYLET APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN CUT TO THE APPROPRIATE LENGTH DURING ITS MANUFACTURING, HOWEVER, THE TIP OF THE STYLET'S BEVEL IS STRETCHED. BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED, NO SPECIFIC CONCLUSION CAN BE DRAWN. IF APPROPRIATE, A FOLLOW-UP REPORT WILL BE FILED WHEN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THIS INCIDENT IS RECEIVED. |
3.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332229 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE17TKCD |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL KIT |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K840179 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
02/24/1984 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
412070 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
423016 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
400109 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2002-00060 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
10/07/2002 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
10/15/2002 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
03/30/2004 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE17TKCD |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332229 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60352183 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
09/11/2002 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
09/13/2002 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 10/07/2002 MDR TEXT KEY: 1468141 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
DOCTOR MET RESISTANCE UPON REMOVING EPIDURAL CATHETER, CONTINUED TO PULL. UPON REMOVAL, FOUND TIP OF CATHETER MISSING (APPROX 1 CM). PT IN FOR BOWEL CANCER. UNABLE TO SEE CATHETER ON X-RAY. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 10/07/2002 MDR TEXT KEY: 1468144 |
THE ACTUAL SAMPLE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR THE MFR'S EVAL. BASED ON THE INFO PROVIDED NO SPECIFIC CONCLUSIONS CAN BE DRAWN. HOWEVER, IT APPEARS THAT THE CATHETER BECAME LODGED IN BETWEEN TWO RIGID BODY STRUCTURES AND WAS PULLED BEYONG ITS DESIGN CAPABILITIES. |
4.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332220 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18TK |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL KIT |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K840179 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
02/24/1984 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
403077 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
414038 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
385346 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2002-00050 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
08/27/2002 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
08/30/2002 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18TK |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332220 |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
07/31/2002 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 08/27/2002 MDR TEXT KEY: 1438206 |
THE ACTUAL SAMPLE WAS NOT MADE AVAILABLE TO THE MFR FOR EVALUATION. WITHOUT THE SAMPLE, A COMPLETE INVESTIGATION COULD NOT BE PERFORMED. BASED ON THE INFO PROVIDED, NO SPECIFIC CONCLUSIONS CAN BE DRAWN. |
5.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
|||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
|||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
|||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
|||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332220 |
|||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18TK |
|||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL KIT |
|||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K840179 |
|||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
|||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
|||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
|||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
|||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
|||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
|||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
02/24/1984 |
|||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
|||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
393245 |
|||
MDR REPORT KEY |
404253 |
|||
EVENT KEY |
382060 |
|||
REPORT NUMBER |
404253 |
|||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
|||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
|||
REPORT SOURCE |
USER FACILITY |
|||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
|||
REPORT DATE |
06/27/2002 |
|||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
07/09/2002 |
|||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
|||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
|||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
|||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
10/31/2003 |
|||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18TK |
|||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332220 |
|||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60315607 |
|||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
YES |
|||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
|||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
|||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
06/08/2002 |
|||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
|||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
|||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
HOSPITALIZATION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 06/27/2002 MDR TEXT KEY: 1404325 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
AS REPORTED BY USER FACILITY ON MEDWATCH: DURING REMOVAL OF THE EPIDURAL CATHETER IT STRETCHED AND BROKE. AS REPORTED BY USER FACILITY TO MFR: UPON REMOVAL OF THE EPIDURAL CATHETER RESISTANCE WAS MET AND WHEN THEY PULLED THE CATHETER OUT, IT WAS NOT INTACT. DR BELIEVES THIS WAS A 20G CLOSED TIP CATHETER. 5-6 CM WERE VISABLE ON CT SCAN. |
6.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332229 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE17TKCD |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL KIT |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K840179 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
02/24/1984 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
384788 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
395781 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
373935 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2002-00019 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
OTHER |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
05/01/2002 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
05/20/2002 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
INVALID DATA |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
07/31/2003 |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
NO ANSWER PROVIDED |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
04/25/2002 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 05/20/2002 MDR TEXT KEY: 1373881 |
THE ACTUAL DEVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AT THIS TIME NO SPECIFIC CONCLUSIONS CAN BE DRAWN. THE PT HAS, TO DATE, SUFFERED NO ADVERSE EFFFECTS AS A RESULT OF THIS OCCURRENCE. IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE TRAY STATES, "DO NOT WITHDRAW CATHETER THROUGH THE NEEDLE BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING". |
7.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332230 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18HK |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL KIT |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K840179 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
02/24/1984 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
384803 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
395796 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
373950 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2002-00018 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
04/30/2002 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
05/20/2002 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
08/31/2003 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18HK |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332230 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60293189 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
YES |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
03/22/2002 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
04/23/2002 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
01/01/2002 |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 04/30/2002 MDR TEXT KEY: 1373932 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
USER FACILITY REPORTS THE FOLLOWING: 1. CATHETER PLACE ATRAUMATICALLY INTO PATIENT. 2. DR. ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE EPIDURAL TWO HOURS LATER WHILE PATIENT WAS LYING DOWN AND MET RESISTANCE. 3. DR. HAD THE PATIENT SIT UP AND LEAN FORWARD AND STILL MET RESISTANCE WHILE ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE THE CATHETER. DR CONTINUED PULLING ON CATHETER FOR WHICH IT STRETCHED AND WHEN REMOVED, THE "BLUE TIP" WAS MISSING. 4. FRAGMENT LEFT IN PATIENT'S BACK. 5. DR MADE FOLLOW-UP CALL TO THE PATIENT APRIL 16TH FOR WHICH THE PATIENT WAS ASYMPTOMATIC. 6. DR WILL NOT RELEASE THE SAMPLE. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 04/30/2002 MDR TEXT KEY: 1373935 |
THE ACTUAL SAMPLE WAS REQUESTED FOR NON-DESTRUCTIVE ANALYSIS, HOWEVER, THE DR. WILL NOT RELEASE THE SAMPLE. BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AT THIS TIME NO SPECIFIC CONCLUSIONS CAN BE DRAWN. THE PATIENT HAS, TO DATE, SUFFERED NO ADVERSE EFFECTS AS A RESULT OF THIS OCCURRENCE. IF THE ACTUAL SAMPLE, OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IN RECEIVED, A FOLLOW-UP REPORT WILL BE FILED. |
8.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
|||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
|||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
|||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
|||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332220 |
|||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18TK |
|||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL KIT |
|||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K840179 |
|||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
|||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
|||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
|||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
|||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
|||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
|||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
02/24/1984 |
|||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
|||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
|||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
379763 |
|||
MDR REPORT KEY |
390720 |
|||
EVENT KEY |
369032 |
|||
REPORT NUMBER |
390720 |
|||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
|||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
|||
REPORT SOURCE |
USER FACILITY |
|||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
|||
REPORT DATE |
04/16/2002 |
|||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
04/16/2002 |
|||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
|||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
|||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
|||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18TK |
|||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332220 |
|||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
YES |
|||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
|||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
|||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
03/27/2002 |
|||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
|||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
|||
DATE REPORT TO MANUFACTURER |
04/03/2002 |
|||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 04/16/2002 MDR TEXT KEY: 1356831 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
FACILITY REPORTS THE FOLLOWING: ONE DAY FOLLOWING INSERTION OF EPIDURAL CATHETER IT BECAME OCCLUDED AND WAS REMOVED. ONE-HALF OF THE TIP WAS NOTED TO BE MISSING AND WAS BELIEVED TO BE REMAINING IN PT. PT EVALUATED. CONTINUES TO BE WITHOUT MOTOR OR SENSORY DEFICITS. |
9.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
EPIDURAL CATHETER |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
EPIDURAL CATHETER |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332204 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE17TO |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
EPIDURAL CATHETER |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K813186 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
* |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
12/11/1981 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
365379 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
376291 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
355081 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2002-00002 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
OTHER |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL,FOLLOWUP |
||||
REPORT DATE |
02/01/2002 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
02/07/2002 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE17TO |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332204 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
YES |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
NO |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
11/14/2001 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
01/07/2002 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
YES |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
INITIAL |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 02/01/2002 MDR TEXT KEY: 1308540 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THE FOLLOWING: CATHETER TIP SHEARED OFF IN PT WHILE REMOVING. AT PRESENT, CATHETER FRAGMENT REMAINS ASYMPTOMATICALLY IN PT'S BACK. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 02/01/2002 MDR TEXT KEY: 1308543 |
THE EPIDURAL CATHETER WAS RETURNED FOR EVAL. THE CATHETER WAS NOT STRETCHED. APPROXIMATELY 8MM OF THE CATHETER WAS SHEARED OFF. BECAUSE THE CATHETER WAS SHEARED, IT IS MOST POSSIBLE THAT USER ERROR CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENT. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE TRAY STATES: "DO NOT WITHDRAW CATHETER THROUGH NEEDLE DUE TO POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING". |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 02/01/2002 MDR TEXT KEY: 1393296 |
THE ACTUAL SAMPLE RECEIVED BY B. BRAUN MEDICAL, INC. WAS FORWARDED TO THE MFR B. BRAUN MELSUNGEN AG FOR EVAL. B. BRAUN MELSUNGEN AG'S EXAMINATION RESULTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: "THE USED CATHETER IS CUT APPROX 25MM FROM THE TIP. EXAMINATION BY MICROSCOPE CLEARLY SHOWED AN OVERSTRETCHED CATHETER WITH TYPICAL DAMAGES. REASON FOR THIS COULD ONLY BE THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE CATHETER THROUGH THE EPIDURAL NEEDLE. IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE A STRICT WARNING AGAINST THIS PROCEDURE IS EXPRESSED BECAUSE OF THE EXISTING RISK THAT THE CATHETER COULD SHEAR OFF." |
10.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
CUSTOM EPIDURAL SPINAL KIT |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CUSTOM EPIDURAL SPINAL KIT |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
555522 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CESJ |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
355097 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
365974 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
345069 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2001-00057 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
12/05/2001 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
12/12/2001 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CESJ |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
555522 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
DATE RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
12/03/2001 |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
11/12/2001 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
11/12/2001 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
YES |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
INITIAL |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 12/05/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1271188 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THE FOLLOWING : "DURING REMOVAL OF AN EPIDURAL CATHETER FROM A SURGICAL PT, THE NURSE MET WITH SLIGHT RESISTANCE BUT CONTINUED TO REMOVE. UPON REMOVAL OF THE CATHETER THE NURSE NOTICED THAT THE TIP WAS MISSING (APPROX 2-3CM). PT WAS DISCHARGED WITHOUT INTERVENTION". |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 12/12/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1271191 |
THE RETURNED CATHETER WAS MISSING AN UNKNOWN PORTION OF THE DISTAL TIP. THE CATHETER APPEARED STRETCHED AND ELONGATED WITH A REDUCTION IN THE OUTER DIAMETER INDICATING THAT THE CATHETER HAD BECOME LODGED BETWEEN TWO RIGID BODY STRUCTURES AND STRETCHED BEYOND ITS INTENDED DESIGN CAPABILITIES. THIS OCCURRENCE DID NOT APPEAR TO BE THE RESULT OF ANY PRODUCT QUALITY DEFICIENCIES OR PRODUCT MALFUNCTION. THE PT WAS RELEASED WITHOUT INTERVENTION. NO FURTHER INFO REGARDING PT'S CONDITION HAS BEEN COMMUNICATED TO B. BRAUN MEDICAL. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE TRAY STATES: "DO NOT WITHDRAW CATHETER THROUGH THE NEEDLE BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING". |
11.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
EPIDURAL CATHETER |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332221 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE17TK |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
EPIDURAL CATHETER |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K840179 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
02/24/1984 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
350006 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
360848 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
340118 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2001-00054 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL,FOLLOWUP |
||||
REPORT DATE |
10/10/2001 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
11/09/2001 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
05/31/2003 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE17TK |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332221 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60232525 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
YES |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
10/04/2001 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
10/25/2001 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
YES |
||||
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
07/01/2001 |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 10/10/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1253834 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
USER FACILITY REPORTED THE FOLLOWING: "CATHETER WAS REMOVED BY BY "FLOOR NURSE", RESISTANCE WAS MET, CONTINUED TO PULL AT CATHETER, STRETCHING SAME. CATHETER SNAPPED AND WAS REMOVED. UPON INSPECTION AND COMPARISON WITH A NEW CATHETER, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE BLUE TIP OF THE REMOVED CATHETER WAS MISSING". NO FURTHER INFO WAS PROVIDED REGARDING THE CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING THIS EVENT. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 10/10/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1253836 |
THE RETURNED PORTION OF THE CATHETER WAS MISSING THE DISTAL TIP. THE CATHETER APPEARED STRETCHED AND ELONGATED WITH A REDUCTION IN THE OUTER DIAMETER, INDICATING THAT THE CATHETER HAD BECOME LODGED BETWEEN TWO RIGID BODY STRUCTURES AND STRETCHED BEYOND ITS INTENDED DESIGN CAPABILITIES. THIS OCCURRENCE DID NOT APPEAR TO BE THE RESULT OF ANY PRODUCT QUALITY DEFICIENCIES OR PRODUCT MALFUNCTION. IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE TRAY STATES, "DO NOT WITHDRAWAL CATHETER THROUGH THE NEEDLE BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING". |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 10/10/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1391964 |
THE ACTUAL SAMPLE RETURNED TO B. BRAUN MEDICAL, INC. WAS FORWARDED TO THE MFR. B. BRAUN MELSUNGEN AG. B. BRAUN MELSUNGEN'S EXAMINATION RESULTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: "VISUAL INSPECTION BY MICROSCOPE SHOWS AN OVERSTRETCHED CATHETER. ATTENUATION MARKS OR OTHER SIGNS AS A CONSEQUENCE OF MFG PROBLEMS ARE NOT VISIBLE. CO SUPPOSES THAT THE CATHETER WAS JAMMED BECAUSE OF THE ANATOMIC CIRCUMSTANCES AND THEN SNAPPED AS A RESULT OF TOO HIGH TENSILE FORCES DURING PULLING." |
12.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
EPIDURAL CATHETER |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332221 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE17TK |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
EPIDURAL CATHETER |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K840179 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
02/24/1984 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
341679 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
352410 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
332016 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2001-00048 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
08/22/2001 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
09/19/2001 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE17TK |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332221 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60217828 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
YES |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
08/21/2001 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
08/22/2001 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
YES |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 08/22/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1223394 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THE FOLLOWING: "WHEN EPIDURAL CATHETER WAS BEING REMOVED, MODERATE RESISTANCE WAS MET AND A SNAPPING SOUND WAS HEARD. UPON REMOVAL OF THE CATHETER, THE LAST 1 CM TIP WAS MISSING". NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY THE USER FACILITY REGARDING THE CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING THE EVENT. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 09/19/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1223397 |
THE RETURNED SAMPLE DID NOT EXHIBIT ANY VISIBLE MANUFACTUING RELATED DEFECTS, HOWEVER. A SEGMENT OF THE CATHETER OF UNKNOWN LENGTH WAS MISSING FROM THE DISTAL TIP. THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE USER FACILITY, AND THE APPEARANCE OF THE RETURED SAMPLE, INDICATE THAT THE CATHETER HAD BECOME LODGED BETWEEN RIGID BODY STRUCTURES, AND STRETCHED BEYOND IT'S INTENDED DESIGN CAPABILITIES DURING REMOVAL. THIS OCCURRENCE DID NOT APPEAR TO BE THE RESULT OF ANY PRODUCT QUALITY DEFICIENCIES OR PRODUCT MALFUNCTION. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE ON THE PATIENT'S STATUS. IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE TRAYS STATES, "DO NOT WITHDRAWAL CATHETER THROUGH THE NEELDLE BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING". |
|
13.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
|||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
EPIDURAL TRAY |
|||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
|||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
EPIDURAL TRAY |
|||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332217 |
|||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18TK-10L |
|||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
|||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
341016 |
|||
MDR REPORT KEY |
351731 |
|||
EVENT KEY |
331349 |
|||
REPORT NUMBER |
351731 |
|||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
|||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
|||
REPORT SOURCE |
USER FACILITY |
|||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
|||
REPORT DATE |
08/13/2001 |
|||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
09/14/2001 |
|||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
|||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
|||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
|||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
03/01/2003 |
|||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18TK-10L |
|||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332217 |
|||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60229008 |
|||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
YES |
|||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
|||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
|||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
08/08/2001 |
|||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
|||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
|||
DATE REPORT TO MANUFACTURER |
08/13/2001 |
|||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 08/13/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1220842 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THE FOLLOWING: "APPROX 2MM TIP OF EPIDURAL CATHETER REMAINED IN PT WHEN PULLED BY ANESTHESIOLOGIST. NEUROSURGICAL CONSULT OBTAINED; NO ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED AT THIS TIME". |
14.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
CESK TRAY |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CUSTOM EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
555861 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CESK |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAYS |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K813186 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
12/03/1981 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
339216 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
349910 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
329595 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2001-00041 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
08/30/2001 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
08/31/2001 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
02/28/2006 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CESK |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
555579 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
060201505 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
08/08/2001 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
6 MO |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE REPORT TO MANUFACTURER |
08/21/2001 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
02/01/2001 |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 08/30/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1214068 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
THE MEDWATCH REPORT RECEIVED FROM THE USER FACILITY STATES THE FOLLOWING: "PATIENT TO HAVE EPIDURAL PLACED BY ANESTHESIOLOGIST PRIOR TO PROCEDURE. THE EPIDURAL CATHETER WAS INTRODUCED BETWEEN THE THIRD AND FOURTH VERTEBRAE. RESISTANCE WAS MET AND THE CATHETER COULD NOT BE ADVANCED. AS THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED, THE TIP WAS SHEARED OFF. APPROXIMATELY 1MM OF THE CATHETER TIP REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. PATIENT HAD NO ADVERSE REACTIONS REPORTED ON DISCHARGE FROM THE HOSPITAL." |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 08/31/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1214071 |
THE SAMPLE HAS BEEN REQUESTED, BUT HAS NOT YET BEEN RETURNED. NO CONCLUSION CAN BE DRAWN SINCE THE PRODUCT WAS NOT RETURNED FOR EVAL. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE TRAY STATES, "DO NOT WITHDRAW CATHETER THROUGH THE NEEDLE BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING". NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE ON THE PATIENT'S STATUS. |
15.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA TRAY |
|||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
RADIOPAQUE POLYAMIDE EPIDURAL CATH 20 GA CLOSED TIP |
|||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
|||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
|||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
339787 |
|||
MDR REPORT KEY |
350492 |
|||
EVENT KEY |
330165 |
|||
REPORT NUMBER |
350492 |
|||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
|||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
|||
REPORT SOURCE |
USER FACILITY |
|||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
|||
REPORT DATE |
08/27/2001 |
|||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
08/28/2001 |
|||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
|||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
YES |
|||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
|||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18TK |
|||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
|||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
|||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
YES |
|||
DATE REPORT TO FDA |
08/27/2001 |
|||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
08/24/2001 |
|||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
|||
DATE REPORT TO MANUFACTURER |
08/27/2001 |
|||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 08/27/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1216370 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
EPIDURAL CATHETER TIP BROKE OFF WHEN MD ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE CATHETER. |
16.
|
17.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
|||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
CESK TRAY |
|||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
|||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CUSTOM EPIDURAL TRAY |
|||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
555861 |
|||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CESK |
|||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAYS |
|||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K813186 |
|||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
|||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
|||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
|||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
|||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
|||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
|||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
12/03/1981 |
|||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
|||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
335851 |
|||
MDR REPORT KEY |
346535 |
|||
EVENT KEY |
326349 |
|||
REPORT NUMBER |
346535 |
|||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
|||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
|||
REPORT SOURCE |
USER FACILITY |
|||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
|||
REPORT DATE |
07/24/2001 |
|||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
08/09/2001 |
|||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
|||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
|||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
|||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
01/31/2001 |
|||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CESK |
|||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
555100 |
|||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60063660 |
|||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
|||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
|||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
|||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
01/03/1999 |
|||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
|||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
|||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 07/24/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1201504 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
THE USER FACILITY REPORTS THE FOLLOWING: FAILED EPIDURAL INSERTION - A PIECE OF CATHETER BROKE OFF IN PT. UNABLE TO RETRIEVE CATHETER PART BROKEN OFF. |
18.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
CE TRAY |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332220 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18TK |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL KIT |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K840179 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
02/24/1984 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
332367 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
343032 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
323026 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2001-00027 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
07/12/2001,06/21/2001 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
07/19/2001 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
02/28/2003 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18TK |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332220 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
YES |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
06/21/2001 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
2 MO |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
06/21/2001 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
YES |
||||
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
05/01/2001 |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 07/12/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1188523 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
THE USER FACILITY REPORTS THE FOLLOWING: CATHETER SHEARED LEAVING ABOUT 2 INCHES IN THE PT'S BACK. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 07/19/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1188526 |
THE RETURNED PORTION MEASURED APPROX 107CM IN LENGTH, WITH APPROXIMATE 7.5MM OF THE DISTAL TIP PORTION MISSING. THE CATHETER APPEARED STRETCHED AND ELONGATED WITH A REDUCTION IN THE OUTER DIAMETER, INDICATING THAT THE CATHETER HAD BECOME LODGED BETWEEN TWO RIGID BODY STRUCTURES AND STRETCHED BEYOND ITS INTENDED DESIGN CAPABILITIES. THIS OCCURRENCE DID NOT APPEAR TO BE THE RESULT OF ANY PRODUCT QUALITY DEFICIENCIES OR PRODUCT MALFUNCTION. IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE TRAY STATES, "DO NOT WITHDRAWAL CATHETER THROUGH THE NEEDLE BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING". |
19.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
CUSTOM TRAY |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CUSTOM TRAY |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
555311 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CESK-555311 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
332372 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
343037 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
323030 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2001-00028 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
07/18/2001 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
07/19/2001 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CESK-555311 |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
555311 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
06/25/2001 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
06/27/2001 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 07/18/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1188545 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
PHYSICIAN REPORTING WHEN REMOVING CATHETER (20G CLOSED TIP), SOME RESISTANCE WAS MET, THE CATHETER STRETCHED, AND WHEN IT WAS REMOVED, THE CATHETER WAS NOT INTACT. ONE CM OF THE CATHETER BROKE AT THE DISTAL END WHEN REMOVING. PT IS "FINE" PER PHYSICIAN. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 07/19/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1188548 |
NO CONCLUSION CAN BE DRAWN SINCE THE PRODUCT WAS NOT RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE TRAY STATES, "DO NOT WITHDRAW CATHETER THROUGH THE NEEDLE BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING". NO FURTHER INFO IS AVAILABLE ON THE PT'S STATUS. |
20.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
EPIDURAL CATHETER |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
333521 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
EC20CST |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL KITS |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K840179 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
02/24/1984 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
326161 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
336866 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
317047 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2001-00017 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
05/23/2001 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
06/08/2001 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
EC20CST |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
333521 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
05/16/2001 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
05/16/2001 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
NO |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
INITIAL |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 05/23/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1164607 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
UPON REMOVAL OF THE EPIDURAL CATHETER THE NURSE EXPERIENCED RESISTANCE. THE ANESTHETIST WAS CALLED IN TO REMOVE THE CATHETER AND THE ANESTHETIST ALSO MET RESISTANCE, BUT WITHDREW THE CATHETER. THE TIP OF THE CATHETER WAS ABSENT WHEN REMOVED. THE USER/FACILITY WAS CONTACTED IN 2001 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. THE EPIDURAL WAS ADMINISTERED FOR LABOR AND DELIVERY. THE CATHETER WAS INSERTED EASILY, BUT WHEN REMOVED RESISTANCE WAS MET. A CT SCAN WAS PERFORMED AND THE TIP WAS NOT IN THE EPIDURAL SPACE, BUT IN THE SOFT TISSUE. THE PATIENT WAS RELEASED FROM THE HOSPITAL WITH NO ADVERSE EFFECTS. THE HOSPITAL'S RISK MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT WILL NOT RELEASE THE SAMPLE FOR EVALUATION. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 05/23/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1164611 |
THE SAMPLE IS BEING RETAINED BY THE USER/FACILITY AND WILL NOT BE RELEASED. NO CONCLUSION CAN BE DRAWN SINCE THE DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. THE PATIENT SUFFERED NO ADVERSE EFFECTS AS A RESULT OF THIS OCCURENCE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE ON THE PATIENT STATUS. IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE TRAY STATES, "DO NOT WITHDRAW CATHETER THROUGH THE NEEDLE BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING". |
|
21.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
EPIDURAL CATHETER |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
333520 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
EC20-0 |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL KITS |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K840179 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
02/24/1984 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
319314 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
329950 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
310506 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2001-00013 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
04/02/2001 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
04/26/2001 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
02/01/2004 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
EC20-0 |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
333520 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
982990 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
2 YR |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
03/30/2001 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
02/01/1999 |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
INITIAL |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 04/02/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1138878 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
MEDWATCH REPORT RECEIVED FROM USER/FACILITY STATES: "BLUE TIP NOT ON END OF EPIDURAL CATHETER AT THE TIME OF REMOVAL. X-RAY DID NOT LOCATE IT. PT WITHOUT NEUROLOGICAL DEFICITS." THE USER/FACILITY WAS CONTACTED ON 4/2001 FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. THE SAMPLE WAS INADVERTENTLY DISCARDED. THE PT WAS DISCHARGED WITH NO ADVERSE EFFECTS AS A RESULT OF THIS OCCURRENCE. NO ADDITIONAL INFO COULD BE PROVIDED. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 04/02/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1138881 |
NO CONCLUSION CAN BE DRAWN SINCE THE DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED FOR EVAL. NO FURTHER INFO IS AVAILABLE ON THE PT'S STATUS. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE TRAY STATES, "DO NOT WITHDRAWAL CATHETER THROUGH THE NEEDLE BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING". |
22.
BRAND NAME |
BRAUN PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
EPIDURAL CATHETER |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
312646 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
323181 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
304015 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
323181 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
BSO |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
VOLUNTARY |
||||
REPORT DATE |
03/21/2001 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
03/27/2001 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
NO |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
YES |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
EC20-0-333520 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
9829902004-02 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 03/21/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1114118 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
BLUE TIP NOT ON END OF EPIDURAL CATHETER AT THE TIME OF REMOVAL. X-RAY DID NOT LOCATE IT. PT WITHOUT NEUROLOGIC DEFICITS. |
23.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
|||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL CUSTOM TRAY |
|||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
|||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CUSTOM EPIDURAL TRAY |
|||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
555861 |
|||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CESK |
|||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAYS |
|||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K813186 |
|||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
|||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
|||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
|||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
|||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
|||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
|||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
12/03/1981 |
|||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
|||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
309578 |
|||
MDR REPORT KEY |
320053 |
|||
EVENT KEY |
300978 |
|||
REPORT NUMBER |
320053 |
|||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
|||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
|||
REPORT SOURCE |
USER FACILITY |
|||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
|||
REPORT DATE |
02/28/2001 |
|||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
03/09/2001 |
|||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
|||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
|||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
|||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CESK |
|||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
555175 |
|||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
|||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
|||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
|||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
02/08/2001 |
|||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
|||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
|||
DATE REPORT TO MANUFACTURER |
02/06/2001 |
|||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 02/28/2001 MDR TEXT KEY: 1103228 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
DURING PLACEMENT OF THE EPIDURAL CATHETER FOR A C-SECTION THE PHYSICIAN ADVANCED THE CATHETER APROXIMATELY 1 TO 2 CM WHEN RESISTANCE WAS MET. THE CATHETER WAS PULLED BACK AND A PORTION OF THE TIP WAS MISSING; APPROXIMATELY 1/2 CM. THE CATHETER TIP REMAINS IN THE PT. THE USER/FACILITY WAS CONTACTED ON 2/9/01 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED AND THE LOT NUMBER COULD NOT BE DETERMINED. THE PT SUFFERED NO ADVERSE EFFECTS AS A RESULT OF THIS OCCURRENCE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION COULD BE PROVIDED. RECEIVED MEDWATCH REPORT ON 2/23/01 FROM USER/FACILITY STATING: "DURING EPIDURAL CATH PLACEMENT, MD MET RESISTANCE, PULLED BACK ON CATHETER. BLUE CATH TIP TO SHEAR OFF INTO EPIDURAL SPACE." |
|
24.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
EPIDURAL CATHETER |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
EPIDURAL CATHETER |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
UNK EPIDURAL CATH. |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
UNK |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
301077 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
311270 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
292565 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2000-00050 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
BSO |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
12/15/2000 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
01/05/2001 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
UNK EPIDURAL CATH. |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
12/06/2000 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
12/06/2000 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
INITIAL |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 12/15/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 1072341 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
THE FACILITY/USER STATES: "WHEN NURSE REMOVED EPIDURAL CATHETER, 1-2CM AT TIP WAS MISSING. UNABLE TO SEE ON X-RAY." A FOLLOW-UP CALL WAS MADE ON 1/4/01. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE USER/FACILITY INDICATED THAT THE PHYSICIAN FELT HE PULLED THE CATHETER A LITTLE HARDER THAN HE SHOULD HAVE. THE PT SUFFERED NO ADVERSE EFFECTS AS A RESULT OF THIS OCCURRENCE. THE LOT NUMBER AND CATALOG NUMBER COULD NOT BE DETERMINED. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 12/15/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 1072344 |
THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE USER/FACILITY, SUGGESTS THAT THE CATHETER HAD BECOME LODGED BETWEEN TWO RIGID BODY STRUCTURES, AND STRETECHED BEYOND IT'S INTENDED DESIGN CAPABILITIES DURING REMOVAL. THIS OCCURRENCE DID NOT APPEAR TO BE THE RESULT OF ANY PRODUCT QUALITY DEFICIENCIES OR PRODUCT MALFUNCTION. THE FACILITY'S RISK MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT WILL NOT RELEASE THE SAMPLE FOR EVAL. IN THE ABSENCE OF A RETURNED SAMPLE, NO SPECIFIC CONCLUSIONS CAN BE DRAWN. THE PT SUFFERED NO ADVERSE EFFECTS AS A RESULT OF THIS OCCURRENCE. IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE TRAY STATES, "DO NOT WITHDRAWAL CATHETER THROUGH THE NEEDLE BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING". |
|
25.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
EPIDURAL CATHETER |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
EPIDURAL CATHETER |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
UNK EPIDURAL CATH. |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
UNK |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
300398 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
310511 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
291848 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2000-00058 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
BSO |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
12/19/2000 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
12/27/2000 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
UNK EPIDURAL CATH. |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
12/19/2000 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
12/13/2000 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
INITIAL |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 12/19/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 1069546 |
NO CONCLUSION CAN BE DRAWN SINCE THE PRODUCT WAS NOT RETURNED FOR EVAL. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE ON THE PT'S STATUS. IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE TRAY STATES, "DO NOT WITHDRAW CATHETER THROUGH THE NEEDLE BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING". |
|
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 12/19/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 1069601 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
MEDWATCH FROM USER/FACILITY STATES: IN 2000 THE PT HAD A LAMINECTOMY, SPINAL FUSION AND INSERTION OF AN EPIDURAL (PERIFIX) CATHETER. IN 3 DAYS LATER, WHEN THE ANESTHETIST WAS TRYING TO REMOVE THE EPIDURAL CATHETER FROM THE PT, THE CATHETER BROKE AND APPROX 8 INCHES REMAINED IN THE WOUND." A FOLLOW-UP CALL WAS MADE 17 DAYS FOLLOWING LAMINECTOMY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE USER/FACILITY INDICATED THAT THE ANESTHESIOLOGIST FELT MODERATE RESISTANCE UPON REMOVAL. THE SAMPLE WAS DISCARDED. THE LOT NUMBER AND THE CATALOG NUMBER COULD NOT BE PROVIDED. THE PT IS IN REHABILITATION AND SUFFERED NO ADVERSE EFFECTS AS A RESULT OF THIS OCCURRENCE. |
26.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA SET |
|||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
EPIDURAL CATHETER |
|||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
|||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
299388 |
|||
MDR REPORT KEY |
309434 |
|||
EVENT KEY |
290827 |
|||
REPORT NUMBER |
309434 |
|||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
|||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
|||
REPORT SOURCE |
VOLUNTARY |
|||
REPORT DATE |
12/12/2000 |
|||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
12/19/2000 |
|||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
NO |
|||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
|||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
|||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 12/12/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 1065633 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
THE PT HAD A LAMINECTOMY, SPINAL FUSION AND INSERTION OF AN EPIDURAL (PERIFIX) CATHETER. WHEN THE ANESTHETIST WAS TRYING TO REMOVE THE EPIDURAL CATHETER FROM THE PT, THE CATHETER BROKE AND APPROX 8 INCHES REMAINED IN THE WOUND. |
27.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
ESPOCAN COMBINED SPINAL/EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA SET |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
333192 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
ES1827K |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL KITS |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K840179 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
02/24/1984 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
293980 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
303766 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
285458 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2000-00045 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL,FOLLOWUP |
||||
REPORT DATE |
10/17/2000 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
11/03/2000 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
02/28/2003 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
ES1827K |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
333192 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60117793 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
YES |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
YES |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
10/04/2000 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
4 MO |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
10/04/2000 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
INITIAL |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 10/17/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 1044914 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
UPON REMOVAL OF EPIDURAL CATHETER, BLUE TIP WAS MISSING. NO RESISTANCE WAS NOTED WHEN REMOVED. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 10/17/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 1044917 |
THE SAMPLE HAS BEEN REQUESTED FROM THE USER FACILITY, BUT HAS NOT YET BEEN RECEIVED; THEREFORE, NO CONCLUSION CAN BE DRAWN. A FOLLOW-UP WILL BE FILED IF MORE INFO BECOMES AVAILABLE. NO FURTHER INFO IS AVAILABLE ON THE PT'S STATUS. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE TRAY STATES, "DO NOT WITHDRAWAL CATHETER THROUGH THE NEEDLE BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING". |
|
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 10/17/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 1147687 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
UPON REMOVAL OF EPIDURAL CATHETER, BLUE TIP WAS MISSING. NO RESISTANCE WAS NOTED WHEN REMOVED. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 10/17/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 1147690 |
FOLLOW UP #1: THE SAMPLE WAS RECEIVED ON 11/15/00. THE RETURNED PORTION MEASURED APPROX 107 CM IN LENGTH, WITH THE DISTAL TIP PORTION MISSING. THE CATHETER APPEARED STRETCHED AND ELONGATED WITH A REDUCTION IN THE OUTER DIAMETER, INDICATING THAT THE CATHETER HAD BECOME LEDGED BETWEEN TWO RIGID BODY STRUCTURES AND STRETCHED BEYOND ITS INTENDED DESIGN CAPABILITIES. THIS OCCURRENCE DID NOT APPEAR TO BE THE RESULT OF ANY PRODUCT QUALITY DEFICIENCIES OR PRODUCT MALFUNCTION. |
28.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
* |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
333521 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
293986 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
303772 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
285464 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2000-00019 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
10/13/2000 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
11/03/2000 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
INVALID DATA |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
333521 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
10/05/2000 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
10/05/2000 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
INITIAL |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 10/13/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 1044938 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
DISTAL TIP OF SOFT TIP CATHETER WAS ABSENT UPON REMOVAL OF CATHETER. DR PERFORMED THE PLACEMENT OF THE CATHETER. THE SAMPLE WILL NOT BE RETURNED; HOWEVER, A PHOTO WAS SUPPLIED. NO FURTHER INFO COULD BE OBTAINED. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 11/03/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 1044941 |
THE DEVICE IS NOT BEING RETURNED FOR EVALUATION; ALTHOUGH A PHOTO WAS SUPPLIED. THE SHAPE OF THE CATHETER IN THE PHOTO GIVES THE APPEARANCE THE SAMPLE WAS STRETCHED AND ELONGATED. THE IMAGE OF THE PHOTO SUGGESTS THAT THE CATHETER HAD BECOME LODGED BETWEEN TWO RIGID BODY STRUCTURES, AND STRETCHED BEYOND ITS INTENDED DESIGN CAPABILITIES DURING REMOVAL. HOWEVER, SINCE THE SAMPLE WAS NOT RETURNED NO CONCLUSION CAN BE DRAWN. NO FURTHER INFO IS AVAILABLE ON THE PT'S STATUS. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE TRAY STATES, "DO NOT WITHDRAWAL CATHETER THROUG THE NEEDLE BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING". |
|
29.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRY W/18G X 3 1/2 HUSTEAD |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332084 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18HKST |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL KITS |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K840179 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
02/24/1994 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
292111 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
301808 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
283553 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2000-00042 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL,FOLLOWUP |
||||
REPORT DATE |
09/28/2000,09/26/2000 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
10/24/2000 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
02/28/2003 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18HKST |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332084 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60125694 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO ANSWER PROVIDED |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
09/26/2000 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
09/26/2000 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
07/01/2000 |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 09/28/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 1037046 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
PT WAS POST-OP WITH AN EPIDURAL FOR PAIN CONTROL. THE CATHETER WAS INSERTED IN 2000. IT WAS DISCONTINUED AND REMOVED BY AN RN 5 DAYS LATER. UPON REMOVAL, THE RN INSPECTED THE CATHETER AND NOTICED THAT THE BLUE TIP OF EPIDURAL CATHETER WAS MISSING. THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT ATTEMPT REMOVAL. THE PT WAS INFORMED. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 09/28/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 1037049 |
NO CONCLUSION CAN BE DRAWN SINCE THE SAMPLE WAS NOT RETURNED. THIS REPORT WILL BE RE-OPENED IF THE SAMPLE OR ADD'L INFO BECOMES AVAILABLE. IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE TRAY STATES, "DO NOT WITHDRAW CATHETER THROUGH THE NEEDLE BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING". NO FURTHER INFO IS AVAILABLE ON THE PT'S STATUS. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 09/28/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 1135016 |
THE SAMPLE WAS RECEIVED. THE BLUE TIP OF THE CATHETER WAS MISSING. THERE WAS NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION PROVIDED TO SPECIFICALLY DETERMINE HOW THE SEPARATION OCCURRED; HOWEVER, PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS OF THIS NATURE HAVE SHOWN THAT SEVERAL FORCES MAY INTERACT TO CAUSE OCCURRENCES OF THIS TYPE. THE POSITION OF THE CATHETER BETWEEN VERTEBRAE OR LIGAMENTS WITHIN THE PT'S BACK, LENGTH OF TIME IN VIVO, TENSILE FORCEPS APPLIED TO THE CATHETER DURING REMOVAL, OR CATHETER WITHDRAWAL THROUGH THE EPIDURAL NEEDLE ARE ALL FACTORS WHICH, IN COMBINATION OR ALONE MAY RESULT IN THIS TYPE OF OCCURRENCE. |
30.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX - CE 18 HKST |
||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
EPIDURAL CATHETER |
||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
289992 |
||
MDR REPORT KEY |
299596 |
||
EVENT KEY |
281459 |
||
REPORT NUMBER |
299596 |
||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||
PRODUCT CODE |
BSO |
||
REPORT SOURCE |
USER FACILITY |
||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||
REPORT DATE |
10/05/2000 |
||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
10/06/2000 |
||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
NO |
||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
YES |
||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
02/01/2003 |
||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18 HKST |
||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332084 |
||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60125694 |
||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
YES |
||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
NO |
||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
09/26/2000 |
||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 10/05/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 1029048 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
UPON INSPECTION, BLUE TIP OF EPIDURAL CATHETER MISSING WHEN CATHETER REMOVED. |
31.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
EPIDURAL CATHETER |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332221 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE17TK |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
EPIDURAL CATHETER |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K840179 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
02/24/1984 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
285700 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
295171 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
277208 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2000-00022 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
09/01/2000 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
09/08/2000 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
11/30/2002 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE17TK |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332221 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60106519 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
06/10/2000 |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
07/26/2000 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
04/01/2000 |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 09/01/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 1012982 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THE FOLLOWING: EPIDURAL CATHETER BROKE OFF IN PT DURING REMOVAL. THE PT WAS IN SITTING POSITION, WITHDRAWAL GOING AS USUAL, THEN CATHETER ELONGATED AND BROKE. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 09/01/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 1012985 |
NO CONCLUSION CAN BE DRAWN SINCE THE DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. NO FURTHER INFO IS AVAILABLE ON THE PT'S STATUS. IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE INSTRUCTION SHEET STATES, "DO NOT WITHDRAW CATHETER THROUGH THE NEEDLE BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING". |
32.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
CUSTOM EPIDURAL KIT |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CUSTOM EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
555861 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CESK |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAYS |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K813186 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
12/03/1981 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
283878 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
293277 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
275367 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2000-00033 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
08/28/2000 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
08/28/2000 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
06/30/2004 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CESK |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
520016 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60023646 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
08/03/2000 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
1 YR |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
08/03/2000 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
06/01/1999 |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 08/28/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 1006007 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
THE USER FACILITY REPORTS THE FOLLOWING: ANESTHESIOLOGIST REPORTING THAT CATHETER SHEARED AT TIP. THE PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER WAS THREADED THROUGH NEEDLE, RESISTANCE WAS FELT, AND HE TRIED ADVANCING ONE MORE TIME STILL MEETING RESISTANCE. THE PHYSICIAN BEGAN TO PULL BACK ON CATHETER AND MET RESISTANCE AND TRIED TO PULL BACK AGAIN, STILL MEETING RESISTANCE. THE NEEDLE AND CATHETER WERE REMOVED TOGETHER AND NOTICED THEN THAT TIP WAS MISSING. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 08/28/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 1006010 |
NO CONCLUSION CAN BE DRAWN, SINCE THE ACTUAL SAMPLE WAS NOT RETURNED. IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE TRAY STATES, "DO NOT WITHDRAW CATHETER THROUGH THE NEEDLE BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING". THIS REPORT WILL BE RE-OPENED IF ADD'L INFO BECOMES AVAILABLE.
|
33.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL SET |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL SET |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332205 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18C |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
281983 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
291354 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
273501 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2000-00030 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
08/14/2000 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
08/16/2000 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
11/01/2004 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18C |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332205 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60072518 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
07/13/2000 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
06/01/2000 |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 08/14/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 999640 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
THE USER FACILITY REPORTS NINE (9) OCCURRENCES OF STAPH AUREUS INFECTIONS AT THE EPIDURAL CATHETER INSERTION POINT FOLLOWING BACK SURGERIES AND EPIDURALS. THE INFECTION CONTROL GROUP IS INVESTIGATING ALL POTENTIAL SOURCES OF INFECTION, INCLUDING HOSPITAL STAFF, EQUIPMENT, ROOMS, AND PRODUCTS. DURING THIS INVESTIGATION, THE INFECTION CONTROL NURSE DID A GRAM STAIN OF THE CONTENTS OF THE WYETH-AYERST SODIUM CHLORIDE AMPOULE CONTAINED IN A B BRAUN KIT. THE GRAM STAIN TESTED POSITIVE FOR RARE PROTEUS SPECIES AND RARE GRAM POSITIVE COCCI. THIS WAS THE ONLY SAMPLE THE HOSPITAL HAD REMAINING FROM THIS LOT, AND HOSP WAS THEREFORE UNABLE TO PERFORM A RETEST. THE USER FACILITY INDICATED THAT THEY WOULD NOT HAVE NORMALLY CONTACTED THE MFR WITHOUT DOING A RE-TEST FIRST, BUT THEY DID NOT HAVE ANY MORE SAMPLES. THE HOSPITAL ALSO FOUND CONDENSATION IN THE CCU ROOM. THE FACILITY DID NOT PROVIDE ANY SPECIFIC INFO ON HOW THEIR TESTING WAS PERFORMED (I.E., HOW THE SAMPLES WERE HANDLED, STORED, CULTURED, ETC.). THE FACILITY REPORTED TWO DIFFERENT CATALOG NUMBERS (332205 AND 555611), BECAUSE THE FACILITY USES BOTH, BUT THESE EVENTS WERE NOT ATTRIBUTED TO EITHER CATALOG NUMBER SPECIFICALLY. B. BRAUN TESTED SAMPLES FROM THE REPORTED LOT OF SODIUM CHLORIDE (WYETH LOT #119095) WITH NEGATIVE RESULTS. THESE EVENTS ARE ISOLATED TO THIS FACILITY. THERE HAVE BEEN NO OTHER OCCURRENCES OF THIS NATURE REPORTED FROM ANY OTHER FACILITIES USING THESE PRODUCTS. THERE IS NO FURTHER INFO AVAILABLE ON THE PT'S STATUS. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 08/14/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 999641 |
THERE WERE NO KITS OF THE REPORTED LOT AVAILABLE FOR TESTING, BUT KITS CONTAINING THE SAME LOT OF SODIUM CHLORIDE (WYETH LOT#119095) WERE RETRIEVED FROM INVENTORY AND TESTED. ONE CASE WAS SENT TO WYETH-AYERST FOR TESTING, AND ONE WAS TESTED AT B. BRAUN'S MICROBIOLOGY LAB ALONG WITH TWO ADDITIONAL LOTS FOR CONTROL TESTING (7/20/00). BRAUN'S TESTING RESULTS CONCLUDED THAT NO BACTERIAL OR FUNGAL CONTAMINATION WAS PRESENT IN ANY OF THESE SAMPLES. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT INDICATES THAT THESE OCCURRENCES WERE THE RESULT OF ANY STERILITY OR QUALITY DEFICIENCY WITH THIS PRODUCT. |
|
34.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL SET |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL SET |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332205 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18C |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
281968 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
291339 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
273489 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2000-00031 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
08/14/2000 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
08/16/2000 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
11/01/2004 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18C |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332205 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60072518 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
07/13/2000 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
06/01/2000 |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 08/14/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 999600 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
THE USER FACILITY REPORTS NINE (9) OCCURRENCES OF STAPH AUREUS INFECTIONS AT THE EPIDURAL CATHETER INSERTION POINT FOLLOWING BACK SURGERIES AND EPIDURALS. THE INFECTION CONTROL GROUP IS INVESTIGATING ALL POTENTIAL SOURCES OF INFECTION, INCLUDING HOSPITAL STAFF, EQUIPMENT, ROOMS, AND PRODUCTS. DURING THIS INVESTIGATION, THE INFECTION CONTROL NURSE DID A GRAM STAIN OF THE CONTENTS OF THE WYETH-AYERST SODIUM CHLORIDE AMPOULE CONTAINED IN A B BRAUN KIT. THE GRAM STAIN TESTED POSITIVE FOR RARE PROTEUS SPECIES AND RARE GRAM POSITIVE COCCI. THIS WAS THE ONLY SAMPLE THE HOSPITAL HAD REMAINING FROM THIS LOT, AND HOSP WAS THEREFORE UNABLE TO PERFORM A RETEST. THE USER FACILITY INDICATED THAT THEY WOULD NOT HAVE NORMALLY CONTACTED THE MFR WITHOUT DOING A RE-TEST FIRST, BUT THEY DID NOT HAVE ANY MORE SAMPLES. THE HOSPITAL ALSO FOUND CONDENSATION IN THE CCU ROOM. THE FACILITY DID NOT PROVIDE ANY SPECIFIC INFO ON HOW THEIR TESTING WAS PERFORMED (I.E., HOW THE SAMPLES WERE HANDLED, STORED, CULTURED, ETC.). THE FACILITY REPORTED TWO DIFFERENT CATALOG NUMBERS (332205 AND 555611), BECAUSE THE FACILITY USES BOTH, BUT THESE EVENTS WERE NOT ATTRIBUTED TO EITHER CATALOG NUMBER SPECIFICALLY. B. BRAUN TESTED SAMPLES FROM THE REPORTED LOT OF SODIUM CHLORIDE (WYETH LOT #119095) WITH NEGATIVE RESULTS. THESE EVENTS ARE ISOLATED TO THIS FACILITY. THERE HAVE BEEN NO OTHER OCCURRENCES OF THIS NATURE REPORTED FROM ANY OTHER FACILITIES USING THESE PRODUCTS. THERE IS NO FURTHER INFO AVAILABLE ON THE PT'S STATUS. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 08/14/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 999601 |
THERE WERE NO KITS OF THE REPORTED LOT AVAILABLE FOR TESTING, BUT KITS CONTAINING THE SAME LOT OF SODIUM CHLORIDE (WYETH LOT#119095) WERE RETRIEVED FROM INVENTORY AND TESTED. ONE CASE WAS SENT TO WYETH-AYERST FOR TESTING, AND ONE WAS TESTED AT B. BRAUN'S MICROBIOLOGY LAB ALONG WITH TWO ADDITIONAL LOTS FOR CONTROL TESTING (7/20/00). BRAUN'S TESTING RESULTS CONCLUDED THAT NO BACTERIAL OR FUNGAL CONTAMINATION WAS PRESENT IN ANY OF THESE SAMPLES. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT INDICATES THAT THESE OCCURRENCES WERE THE RESULT OF ANY STERILITY OR QUALITY DEFICIENCY WITH THIS PRODUCT. |
35.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL SET |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL SET |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332205 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18C |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
281981 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
291352 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
273499 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2000-00028 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
08/14/2000 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
08/16/2000 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
11/01/2004 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18C |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332205 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60072518 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
07/13/2000 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
06/01/2000 |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 08/14/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 999636 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
THE USER FACILITY REPORTS NINE (9) OCCURRENCES OF STAPH AUREUS INFECTIONS AT THE EPIDURAL CATHETER INSERTION POINT FOLLOWING BACK SURGERIES AND EPIDURALS. THE INFECTION CONTROL GROUP IS INVESTIGATING ALL POTENTIAL SOURCES OF INFECTION, INCLUDING HOSPITAL STAFF, EQUIPMENT, ROOMS, AND PRODUCTS. DURING THIS INVESTIGATION, THE INFECTION CONTROL NURSE DID A GRAM STAIN OF THE CONTENTS OF THE WYETH-AYERST SODIUM CHLORIDE AMPOULE CONTAINED IN A B BRAUN KIT. THE GRAM STAIN TESTED POSITIVE FOR RARE PROTEUS SPECIES AND RARE GRAM POSITIVE COCCI. THIS WAS THE ONLY SAMPLE THE HOSPITAL HAD REMAINING FROM THIS LOT, AND HOSP WAS THEREFORE UNABLE TO PERFORM A RETEST. THE USER FACILITY INDICATED THAT THEY WOULD NOT HAVE NORMALLY CONTACTED THE MFR WITHOUT DOING A RE-TEST FIRST, BUT THEY DID NOT HAVE ANY MORE SAMPLES. THE HOSPITAL ALSO FOUND CONDENSATION IN THE CCU ROOM. THE FACILITY DID NOT PROVIDE ANY SPECIFIC INFO ON HOW THEIR TESTING WAS PERFORMED (I.E., HOW THE SAMPLES WERE HANDLED, STORED, CULTURED, ETC.). THE FACILITY REPORTED TWO DIFFERENT CATALOG NUMBERS (332205 AND 555611), BECAUSE THE FACILITY USES BOTH, BUT THESE EVENTS WERE NOT ATTRIBUTED TO EITHER CATALOG NUMBER SPECIFICALLY. B. BRAUN TESTED SAMPLES FROM THE REPORTED LOT OF SODIUM CHLORIDE (WYETH LOT #119095) WITH NEGATIVE RESULTS. THESE EVENTS ARE ISOLATED TO THIS FACILITY. THERE HAVE BEEN NO OTHER OCCURRENCES OF THIS NATURE REPORTED FROM ANY OTHER FACILITIES USING THESE PRODUCTS. THERE IS NO FURTHER INFO AVAILABLE ON THE PT'S STATUS. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 08/14/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 999637 |
THERE WERE NO KITS OF THE REPORTED LOT AVAILABLE FOR TESTING, BUT KITS CONTAINING THE SAME LOT OF SODIUM CHLORIDE (WYETH LOT#119095) WERE RETRIEVED FROM INVENTORY AND TESTED. ONE CASE WAS SENT TO WYETH-AYERST FOR TESTING, AND ONE WAS TESTED AT B. BRAUN'S MICROBIOLOGY LAB ALONG WITH TWO ADDITIONAL LOTS FOR CONTROL TESTING (7/20/00). BRAUN'S TESTING RESULTS CONCLUDED THAT NO BACTERIAL OR FUNGAL CONTAMINATION WAS PRESENT IN ANY OF THESE SAMPLES. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT INDICATES THAT THESE OCCURRENCES WERE THE RESULT OF ANY STERILITY OR QUALITY DEFICIENCY WITH THIS PRODUCT. |
36.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL SET |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL SET |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332205 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18C |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
281982 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
291353 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
273500 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2000-00029 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
08/14/2000 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
08/16/2000 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
11/01/2004 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18C |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332205 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60072518 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
07/13/2000 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
06/01/2000 |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 08/14/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 999639 |
THERE WERE NO KITS OF THE REPORTED LOT AVAILABLE FOR TESTING, BUT KITS CONTAINING THE SAME LOT OF SODIUM CHLORIDE (WYETH LOT#119095) WERE RETRIEVED FROM INVENTORY AND TESTED. ONE CASE WAS SENT TO WYETH-AYERST FOR TESTING, AND ONE WAS TESTED AT B. BRAUN'S MICROBIOLOGY LAB ALONG WITH TWO ADDITIONAL LOTS FOR CONTROL TESTING (7/20/00). BRAUN'S TESTING RESULTS CONCLUDED THAT NO BACTERIAL OR FUNGAL CONTAMINATION WAS PRESENT IN ANY OF THESE SAMPLES. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT INDICATES THAT THESE OCCURRENCES WERE THE RESULT OF ANY STERILITY OR QUALITY DEFICIENCY WITH THIS PRODUCT. |
|
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 08/14/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 999638 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
THE USER FACILITY REPORTS NINE (9) OCCURRENCES OF STAPH AUREUS INFECTIONS AT THE EPIDURAL CATHETER INSERTION POINT FOLLOWING BACK SURGERIES AND EPIDURALS. THE INFECTION CONTROL GROUP IS INVESTIGATING ALL POTENTIAL SOURCES OF INFECTION, INCLUDING HOSPITAL STAFF, EQUIPMENT, ROOMS, AND PRODUCTS. DURING THIS INVESTIGATION, THE INFECTION CONTROL NURSE DID A GRAM STAIN OF THE CONTENTS OF THE WYETH-AYERST SODIUM CHLORIDE AMPOULE CONTAINED IN A B BRAUN KIT. THE GRAM STAIN TESTED POSITIVE FOR RARE PROTEUS SPECIES AND RARE GRAM POSITIVE COCCI. THIS WAS THE ONLY SAMPLE THE HOSPITAL HAD REMAINING FROM THIS LOT, AND HOSP WAS THEREFORE UNABLE TO PERFORM A RETEST. THE USER FACILITY INDICATED THAT THEY WOULD NOT HAVE NORMALLY CONTACTED THE MFR WITHOUT DOING A RE-TEST FIRST, BUT THEY DID NOT HAVE ANY MORE SAMPLES. THE HOSPITAL ALSO FOUND CONDENSATION IN THE CCU ROOM. THE FACILITY DID NOT PROVIDE ANY SPECIFIC INFO ON HOW THEIR TESTING WAS PERFORMED (I.E., HOW THE SAMPLES WERE HANDLED, STORED, CULTURED, ETC.). THE FACILITY REPORTED TWO DIFFERENT CATALOG NUMBERS (332205 AND 555611), BECAUSE THE FACILITY USES BOTH, BUT THESE EVENTS WERE NOT ATTRIBUTED TO EITHER CATALOG NUMBER SPECIFICALLY. B. BRAUN TESTED SAMPLES FROM THE REPORTED LOT OF SODIUM CHLORIDE (WYETH LOT #119095) WITH NEGATIVE RESULTS. THESE EVENTS ARE ISOLATED TO THIS FACILITY. THERE HAVE BEEN NO OTHER OCCURRENCES OF THIS NATURE REPORTED FROM ANY OTHER FACILITIES USING THESE PRODUCTS. THERE IS NO FURTHER INFO AVAILABLE ON THE PT'S STATUS. |
37.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL SET |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL SET |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332205 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18C |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
281987 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
291358 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
273505 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2000-00023 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
08/14/2000 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
08/16/2000 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
11/01/2004 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18C |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332205 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60072518 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
07/13/2000 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
06/01/2000 |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 08/14/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 999652 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
THE USER FACILITY REPORTS NINE (9) OCCURRENCES OF STAPH AUREUS INFECTIONS AT THE EPIDURAL CATHETER INSERTION POINT FOLLOWING BACK SURGERIES AND EPIDURALS. THE INFECTION CONTROL GROUP IS INVESTIGATING ALL POTENTIAL SOURCES OF INFECTION, INCLUDING HOSPITAL STAFF, EQUIPMENT, ROOMS, AND PRODUCTS. DURING THIS INVESTIGATION, THE INFECTION CONTROL NURSE DID A GRAM STAIN OF THE CONTENTS OF THE WYETH-AYERST SODIUM CHLORIDE AMPOULE CONTAINED IN A B BRAUN KIT. THE GRAM STAIN TESTED POSITIVE FOR RARE PROTEUS SPECIES AND RARE GRAM POSITIVE COCCI. THIS WAS THE ONLY SAMPLE THE HOSPITAL HAD REMAINING FROM THIS LOT, AND HOSP WAS THEREFORE UNABLE TO PERFORM A RETEST. THE USER FACILITY INDICATED THAT THEY WOULD NOT HAVE NORMALLY CONTACTED THE MFR WITHOUT DOING A RE-TEST FIRST, BUT THEY DID NOT HAVE ANY MORE SAMPLES. THE HOSPITAL ALSO FOUND CONDENSATION IN THE CCU ROOM. THE FACILITY DID NOT PROVIDE ANY SPECIFIC INFO ON HOW THEIR TESTING WAS PERFORMED (I.E., HOW THE SAMPLES WERE HANDLED, STORED, CULTURED, ETC.). THE FACILITY REPORTED TWO DIFFERENT CATALOG NUMBERS (332205 AND 555611), BECAUSE THE FACILITY USES BOTH, BUT THESE EVENTS WERE NOT ATTRIBUTED TO EITHER CATALOG NUMBER SPECIFICALLY. B. BRAUN TESTED SAMPLES FROM THE REPORTED LOT OF SODIUM CHLORIDE (WYETH LOT #119095) WITH NEGATIVE RESULTS. THESE EVENTS ARE ISOLATED TO THIS FACILITY. THERE HAVE BEEN NO OTHER OCCURRENCES OF THIS NATURE REPORTED FROM ANY OTHER FACILITIES USING THESE PRODUCTS. THERE IS NO FURTHER INFO AVAILABLE ON THE PT'S STATUS. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 08/14/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 999653 |
THERE WERE NO KITS OF THE REPORTED LOT AVAILABLE FOR TESTING, BUT KITS CONTAINING THE SAME LOT OF SODIUM CHLORIDE (WYETH LOT#119095) WERE RETRIEVED FROM INVENTORY AND TESTED. ONE CASE WAS SENT TO WYETH-AYERST FOR TESTING, AND ONE WAS TESTED AT B. BRAUN'S MICROBIOLOGY LAB ALONG WITH TWO ADDITIONAL LOTS FOR CONTROL TESTING (7/20/00). BRAUN'S TESTING RESULTS CONCLUDED THAT NO BACTERIAL OR FUNGAL CONTAMINATION WAS PRESENT IN ANY OF THESE SAMPLES. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT INDICATES THAT THESE OCCURRENCES WERE THE RESULT OF ANY STERILITY OR QUALITY DEFICIENCY WITH THIS PRODUCT. |
38.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL SET |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL SET |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332205 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18C |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
281973 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
291344 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
273493 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2000-00024 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
08/14/2000 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
08/16/2000 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
11/01/2004 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18C |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332205 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60072518 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
07/13/2000 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
06/01/2000 |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 08/14/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 999612 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
THE USER FACILITY REPORTS NINE (9) OCCURRENCES OF STAPH AUREUS INFECTIONS AT THE EPIDURAL CATHETER INSERTION POINT FOLLOWING BACK SURGERIES AND EPIDURALS. THE INFECTION CONTROL GROUP IS INVESTIGATING ALL POTENTIAL SOURCES OF INFECTION, INCLUDING HOSPITAL STAFF, EQUIPMENT, ROOMS, AND PRODUCTS. DURING THIS INVESTIGATION, THE INFECTION CONTROL NURSE DID A GRAM STAIN OF THE CONTENTS OF THE WYETH-AYERST SODIUM CHLORIDE AMPOULE CONTAINED IN KIT B BRAUN KIT. THE GRAM STAIN TESTED POSITIVE FOR RARE PROTEUS SPECIES AND RARE GRAM POSITIVE COCCI. THIS WAS THE ONLY SAMPLE THE HOSPITAL HAD REMAINING FROM THIS LOT, AND HOSP WAS THEREFORE UNABLE TO PERFORM A RETEST. THE USER FACILITY INDICATED THAT THEY WOULD NOT HAVE NORMALLY CONTACTED THE MFR WITHOUT DOING A RE-TEST FIRST, BUT THEY DID NOT HAVE ANY MORE SAMPLES. THE HOSPITAL ALSO FOUND CONDENSATION IN THE CCU ROOM. THE FACILITY DID NOT PROVIDE ANY SPECIFIC INFO ON HOW THEIR TESTING WAS PERFORMED (I.E., HOW THE SAMPLES WERE HANDLED, STORED, CULTURED, ETC.). THE FACILITY REPORTED TWO DIFFERENT CATALOG NUMBERS (332205 AND 555611), BECAUSE THE FACILITY USES BOTH, BUT THESE EVENTS WERE NOT ATTRIBUTED TO EITHER CATALOG NUMBER SPECIFICALLY. B. BRAUN TESTED SAMPLES FROM THE REPORTED LOT OF SODIUM CHLORIDE (WYETH LOT #119095) WITH NEGATIVE RESULTS. THESE EVENTS ARE ISOLATED TO THIS FACILITY. THERE HAVE BEEN NO OTHER OCCURRENCES OF THIS NATURE REPORTED FROM ANY OTHER FACILITIES USING THESE PRODUCTS. THERE IS NO FURTHER INFO AVAILABLE ON THE PT'S STATUS. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 08/16/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 999613 |
THERE WERE NO KITS OF THE REPORTED LOT AVAILABLE FOR TESTING, BUT KITS CONTAINING THE SAME LOT OF SODIUM CHLORIDE (WYETH LOT #119095) WERE RETRIEVED FROM INVENTORY AND TESTED. ONE CASE WAS SENT TO WYETH-AYERST FOR TESTING, AND ONE WAS TESTED AT B. BRAUN'S MICROBIOLOGY LAB ALONG WITH TWO ADDITIONAL LOTS FOR CONTROL TESTING (7/20/00). BRAUN'S TESTING RESULTS CONCLUDED THAT NO BACTERIAL OR FUNGAL CONTAMINATION WAS PRESENT IN ANY OF THESE SAMPLES. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT INDICATES THAT THESE OCCURRENCES WERE THE RESULT OF ANY STERILITY OR QUALITY DEFICIENCY WITH THIS PRODUCT. |
39.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL SET |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL SET |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332205 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18C |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
281975 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
291346 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
273494 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2000-00025 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
08/14/2000 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
08/16/2000 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
11/01/2004 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18C |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332205 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60072518 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
07/13/2000 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
06/01/2000 |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 08/16/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 999619 |
THERE WERE NO KITS OF THE REPORTED LOT AVAILABLE FOR TESTING, BUT KITS CONTAINING THE SAME LOT OF SODIUM CHLORIDE (WYETH LOT #119095) WERE RETRIEVED FROM INVENTORY AND TESTED. ONE CASE WAS SENT TO WYETH-AYERST FOR TESTING, AND ONE WAS TESTED AT B. BRAUN'S MICROBIOLOGY LAB ALONG WITH TWO ADDITIONAL LOTS FOR CONTROL TESTING (7/20/00). BRAUN'S TESTING RESULTS CONCLUDED THAT NO BACTERIAL OR FUNGAL CONTAMINATION WAS PRESENT IN ANY OF THESE SAMPLES. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT INDICATES THAT THESE OCCURRENCES WERE THE RESULT OF ANY STERILITY OR QUALITY DEFICIENCY WITH THIS PRODUCT. |
|
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 08/14/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 999618 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
THE USER FACILITY REPORTS NINE (9) OCCURRENCES OF STAPH AUREUS INFECTIONS AT THE EPIDURAL CATHETER INSERTION POINT FOLLOWING BACK SURGERIES AND EPIDURALS. THE INFECTION CONTROL GROUP IS INVESTIGATING ALL POTENTIAL SOURCES OF INFECTION, INCLUDING HOSPITAL STAFF, EQUIPMENT, ROOMS, AND PRODUCTS. DURING THIS INVESTIGATION, THE INFECTION CONTROL NURSE DID A GRAM STAIN OF THE CONTENTS OF THE WYETH-AYERST SODIUM CHLORIDE AMPOULE CONTAINED IN A B BRAUN KIT. THE GRAM STAIN TESTED POSITIVE FOR RARE PROTEUS SPECIES AND RARE GRAM POSITIVE COCCI. THIS WAS THE ONLY SAMPLE THE HOSPITAL HAD REMAINING FROM THIS LOT, AND HOSP WAS THEREFORE UNABLE TO PERFORM A RETEST. THE USER FACILITY INDICATED THAT THEY WOULD NOT HAVE NORMALLY CONTACTED THE MFR WITHOUT DOING A RE-TEST FIRST, BUT THEY DID NOT HAVE ANY MORE SAMPLES. THE HOSPITAL ALSO FOUND CONDENSATION IN THE CCU ROOM. THE FACILITY DID NOT PROVIDE ANY SPECIFIC INFO ON HOW THEIR TESTING WAS PERFORMED (I.E., HOW THE SAMPLES WERE HANDLED, STORED, CULTURED, ETC.). THE FACILITY REPORTED TWO DIFFERENT CATALOG NUMBERS (332205 AND 555611), BECAUSE THE FACILITY USES BOTH, BUT THESE EVENTS WERE NOT ATTRIBUTED TO EITHER CATALOG NUMBER SPECIFICALLY. B. BRAUN TESTED SAMPLES FROM THE REPORTED LOT OF SODIUM CHLORIDE (WYETH LOT #119095) WITH NEGATIVE RESULTS. THESE EVENTS ARE ISOLATED TO THIS FACILITY. THERE HAVE BEEN NO OTHER OCCURRENCES OF THIS NATURE REPORTED FROM ANY OTHER FACILITIES USING THESE PRODUCTS. THERE IS NO FURTHER INFO AVAILABLE ON THE PT'S STATUS. |
40.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL SET |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL SET |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332205 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18C |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
281976 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
291347 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
273495 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2000-00026 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
08/14/2000 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
08/16/2000 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
11/01/2004 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18C |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332205 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60072518 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
07/13/2000 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
06/01/2000 |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 08/14/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 999620 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
THE USER FACILITY REPORTS NINE (9) OCCURRENCES OF STAPH AUREUS INFECTIONS AT THE EPIDURAL CATHETER INSERTION POINT FOLLOWING BACK SURGERIES AND EPIDURALS. THE INFECTION CONTROL GROUP IS INVESTIGATING ALL POTENTIAL SOURCES OF INFECTION, INCLUDING HOSPITAL STAFF, EQUIPMENT, ROOMS, AND PRODUCTS. DURING THIS INVESTIGATION, THE INFECTION CONTROL NURSE DID A GRAM STAIN OF THE CONTENTS OF THE WYETH-AYERST SODIUM CHLORIDE AMPOULE CONTAINED IN A B BRAUN KIT. THE GRAM STAIN TESTED POSITIVE FOR RARE PROTEUS SPECIES AND RARE GRAM POSITIVE COCCI. THIS WAS THE ONLY SAMPLE THE HOSPITAL HAD REMAINING FROM THIS LOT, AND HOSP WAS THEREFORE UNABLE TO PERFORM A RETEST. THE USER FACILITY INDICATED THAT THEY WOULD NOT HAVE NORMALLY CONTACTED THE MFR WITHOUT DOING A RE-TEST FIRST, BUT THEY DID NOT HAVE ANY MORE SAMPLES. THE HOSPITAL ALSO FOUND CONDENSATION IN THE CCU ROOM. THE FACILITY DID NOT PROVIDE ANY SPECIFIC INFO ON HOW THEIR TESTING WAS PERFORMED (I.E., HOW THE SAMPLES WERE HANDLED, STORED, CULTURED, ETC.). THE FACILITY REPORTED TWO DIFFERENT CATALOG NUMBERS (332205 AND 555611), BECAUSE THE FACILITY USES BOTH, BUT THESE EVENTS WERE NOT ATTRIBUTED TO EITHER CATALOG NUMBER SPECIFICALLY. B. BRAUN TESTED SAMPLES FROM THE REPORTED LOT OF SODIUM CHLORIDE (WYETH LOT #119095) WITH NEGATIVE RESULTS. THESE EVENTS ARE ISOLATED TO THIS FACILITY. THERE HAVE BEEN NO OTHER OCCURRENCES OF THIS NATURE REPORTED FROM ANY OTHER FACILITIES USING THESE PRODUCTS. THERE IS NO FURTHER INFO AVAILABLE ON THE PT'S STATUS. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 08/16/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 999621 |
THERE WERE NO KITS OF THE REPORTED LOT AVAILABLE FOR TESTING, BUT KITS CONTAINING THE SAME LOT OF SODIUM CHLORIDE (WYETH LOT #119095) WERE RETRIEVED FROM INVENTORY AND TESTED. ONE CASE WAS SENT TO WYETH-AYERST FOR TESTING, AND ONE WAS TESTED AT B. BRAUN'S MICROBIOLOGY LAB ALONG WITH TWO ADDITIONAL LOTS FOR CONTROL TESTING (7/20/00). BRAUN'S TESTING RESULTS CONCLUDED THAT NO BACTERIAL OR FUNGAL CONTAMINATION WAS PRESENT IN ANY OF THESE SAMPLES. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT INDICATES THAT THESE OCCURRENCES WERE THE RESULT OF ANY STERILITY OR QUALITY DEFICIENCY WITH THIS PRODUCT. |
41.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL SET |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL SET |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332205 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18C |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
281979 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
291350 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
273497 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2000-00027 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
08/14/2000 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
08/16/2000 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
11/01/2004 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18C |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332205 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60072518 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
07/13/2000 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
06/01/2000 |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 08/14/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 999630 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
THE USER FACILITY REPORTS NINE (9) OCCURRENCES OF STAPH AUREUS INFECTIONS AT THE EPIDURAL CATHETER INSERTION POINT FOLLOWING BACK SURGERIES AND EPIDURALS. THE INFECTION CONTROL GROUP IS INVESTIGATING ALL POTENTIAL SOURCES OF INFECTION, INCLUDING HOSPITAL STAFF, EQUIPMENT, ROOMS, AND PRODUCTS. DURING THIS INVESTIGATION, THE INFECTION CONTROL NURSE DID A GRAM STAIN OF THE CONTENTS OF THE WYETH-AYERST SODIUM CHLORIDE AMPOULE CONTAINED IN A B BRAUN KIT. THE GRAM STAIN TESTED POSITIVE FOR RARE PROTEUS SPECIES AND RARE GRAM POSITIVE COCCI. THIS WAS THE ONLY SAMPLE THE HOSPITAL HAD REMAINING FROM THIS LOT, AND HOSP WAS THEREFORE UNABLE TO PERFORM A RETEST. THE USER FACILITY INDICATED THAT THEY WOULD NOT HAVE NORMALLY CONTACTED THE MFR WITHOUT DOING A RE-TEST FIRST, BUT THEY DID NOT HAVE ANY MORE SAMPLES. THE HOSPITAL ALSO FOUND CONDENSATION IN THE CCU ROOM. THE FACILITY DID NOT PROVIDE ANY SPECIFIC INFO ON HOW THEIR TESTING WAS PERFORMED (I.E., HOW THE SAMPLES WERE HANDLED, STORED, CULTURED, ETC.). THE FACILITY REPORTED TWO DIFFERENT CATALOG NUMBERS (332205 AND 555611), BECAUSE THE FACILITY USES BOTH, BUT THESE EVENTS WERE NOT ATTRIBUTED TO EITHER CATALOG NUMBER SPECIFICALLY. B. BRAUN TESTED SAMPLES FROM THE REPORTED LOT OF SODIUM CHLORIDE (WYETH LOT #119095) WITH NEGATIVE RESULTS. THESE EVENTS ARE ISOLATED TO THIS FACILITY. THERE HAVE BEEN NO OTHER OCCURRENCES OF THIS NATURE REPORTED FROM ANY OTHER FACILITIES USING THESE PRODUCTS. THERE IS NO FURTHER INFO AVAILABLE ON THE PT'S STATUS. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 08/14/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 999631 |
THERE WERE NO KITS OF THE REPORTED LOT AVAILABLE FOR TESTING, BUT KITS CONTAINING THE SAME LOT OF SODIUM CHLORIDE (WYETH LOT#119095) WERE RETRIEVED FROM INVENTORY AND TESTED. ONE CASE WAS SENT TO WYETH-AYERST FOR TESTING, AND ONE WAS TESTED AT B. BRAUN'S MICROBIOLOGY LAB ALONG WITH TWO ADDITIONAL LOTS FOR CONTROL TESTING (7/20/00). BRAUN'S TESTING RESULTS CONCLUDED THAT NO BACTERIAL OR FUNGAL CONTAMINATION WAS PRESENT IN ANY OF THESE SAMPLES. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT INDICATES THAT THESE OCCURRENCES WERE THE RESULT OF ANY STERILITY OR QUALITY DEFICIENCY WITH THIS PRODUCT. |
42.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
PERIFIX CUSTOM SOFT TIP EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
SOFT TIP EPIDURAL CATH |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332082 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE17TKST |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL KITS |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K840179 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
02/24/1984 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
278952 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
288254 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
270484 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2000-00015 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
OTHER |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
07/20/2000 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
08/01/2000 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE17TKST |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332082 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
06/20/2000 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
06/20/2000 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
INITIAL |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 07/20/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 988701 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
DR PLACED A CATHETER IN PT FOR LABOR AND DELIVERY IN 2000. THE CATHETER WAS PLACED LESS THAN 24 HRS. PT WAS DISCHARGED. PT RETURNED TO EMERGENCY ROOM ON FOLLOWING WEEKEND WITH CHILLS & FEVER. PT WAS SENT HOME SINCE THE DIAGNOSIS WAS NOT CLEAR AT THAT TIME. PT RETURNED TO EMERGENCY ROOM ON TUESDAY, 6/13/2000 WITH CHILLS & FEVER, AND SOME NEUROLOGICAL SIGNS. HAD DEBRIDEMENT SURGERY AND IS DOING FINE. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 07/20/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 988704 |
NO CONCLUSION CAN BE DRAWN SINCE DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED FOR EVAL. TO DATE, THE MFR HAS REC'D NO OTHER REPORTS OF THIS NATURE FOR THIS PRODUCT. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SUGGEST THAT THIS PRODUCT CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THIS EVENT. NO FURTHER INFO IS AVAILABLE ON THE PT'S STATUS. |
43.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332220 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18TK |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL KIT |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K840179 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
02/24/1984 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
278945 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
288247 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
270477 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2000-00017 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
07/24/2000 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
08/01/2000 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
08/30/2000 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18TK |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332220 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60011371 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
YES |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
YES |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
06/20/2000 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
4 YR |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
06/20/2000 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
YES |
||||
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
05/01/2000 |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
INITIAL |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 07/24/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 988678 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
CATHETER TIP SHEARED. APPROXIMATELY 1 INCH MISSING FROM TIP. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 07/24/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 988681 |
A VISUAL INSPECTION OF THE CATHETER FOUND THAT THE TIP EXHIBITED, A CLEAN ANGULAR CUT, WITH NO EVIDENT STRATING OR ELONGATION. THE CATHETER APPEARED TO BE SHEARED. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE TRAY STATES, "DO NOT WITHDRAW CATHETER THROUGH THE NEEDLE BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING". NO FURTHER INFO IS AVAILABLE ON THE PT'S STATUS. |
44.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
|||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
PERIFIX EPIDURAL CATHETERS |
|||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
|||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
PERIFIX EPIDURAL CATHETERS |
|||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
333500 |
|||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
EC18-O |
|||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
|||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
276694 |
|||
MDR REPORT KEY |
285931 |
|||
EVENT KEY |
268259 |
|||
REPORT NUMBER |
285931 |
|||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
|||
PRODUCT CODE |
BSO |
|||
REPORT SOURCE |
USER FACILITY |
|||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
|||
REPORT DATE |
07/10/2000,07/07/2000 |
|||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
07/13/2000 |
|||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
|||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
|||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
|||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
EC18-O |
|||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
333500 |
|||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
|||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
|||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
|||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
01/18/2000 |
|||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
|||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
|||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
OTHER |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 07/10/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 980217 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
THE MEDWATCH REPORT RECEIVED FROM THE USER FACILITY STATES: "THE TIP OF EPIDURAL CATHETER BROKE OFF WHEN TRYING TO PULL BACK ON CATHETER." |
45.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
|||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL CATHETER |
|||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
|||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
|||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
266864 |
|||
MDR REPORT KEY |
275712 |
|||
EVENT KEY |
258504 |
|||
REPORT NUMBER |
275712 |
|||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
|||
PRODUCT CODE |
BSO |
|||
REPORT SOURCE |
USER FACILITY |
|||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
|||
REPORT DATE |
04/26/2000 |
|||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
04/27/2000 |
|||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
NO |
|||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
YES |
|||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
|||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
05/01/2002 |
|||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE-18HK |
|||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332230 |
|||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60080798 |
|||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
YES |
|||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
NO ANSWER PROVIDED |
|||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
|||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
04/24/2000 |
|||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
|||
DATE REPORT TO MANUFACTURER |
04/26/2000 |
|||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 04/26/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 941428 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
BLACK TIP WAS MISSING FROM EPIDURAL CATHETER UPON REMOVAL. EPIDURAL CATHETER FRACTURED AT TIME OF REMOVAL AND BLACK TIP NOT INTACT. |
|
46.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL CUSTOM TRAY |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CUSTOM EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
555861 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CESK |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAYS |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K813186 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
12/03/1981 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
265894 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
274707 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
257551 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2000-00006 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
04/20/2000 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
04/20/2000 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
05/31/2002 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CESK |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
555215 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60079493 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
DATE RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
03/15/2000 |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
1 YR |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
03/15/2000 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
YES |
||||
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
12/01/1999 |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 04/20/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 937609 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
EPIDURAL CATHETER BROKE INTO TWO PIECES. APPROXIMATELY 2 CM REMAINS IN THE PT. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 04/20/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 937612 |
A VISUAL INSPECTION OF THE CATHETER FOUND THAT THE TIP EXHIBITED, A CLEAN ANGULAR CUT, WITH NO EVIDENT STRETCHING OR ELONGATION. THE CATHETER APPEARED TO BE SHEARED. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE TRAY STATES, "DO NOT WITHDRAW CATHETER THROUGH THE NEEDLE BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING". NO FURTHER INFO IS AVAILABLE ON THE PT'S STATUS. |
47.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
|||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
CUSTOM EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA TRAY |
|||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
|||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
264821 |
|||
MDR REPORT KEY |
273570 |
|||
EVENT KEY |
256488 |
|||
REPORT NUMBER |
273570 |
|||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
|||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
|||
REPORT SOURCE |
VOLUNTARY |
|||
REPORT DATE |
03/31/2000 |
|||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
04/13/2000 |
|||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
NO |
|||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
|||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
09/01/2001 |
|||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60070864 |
|||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
YES |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 03/31/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 933426 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
A 10CC GLASS EPIDURAL SYRINGE SHATTERED DURING NEGATIVE ASPIRATION OF A CONTINUOUS LABOR EPIDURAL PLACEMENT. |
48.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
UNK. EPIDURAL CATHETER (NOT A B. BRAUN CAT. NO.) |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
UNK. EPIDURAL CATHETER (NOT A B. BRAUN CAT. NO.) |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
SJ-05501 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
UNK |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
263418 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
272105 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
255118 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2000-00007 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
BSO |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
03/30/2000 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
03/30/2000 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
SJ-05501 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
NO |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
01/31/2000 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
03/14/2000 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
NO |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
INITIAL |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 03/30/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 927628 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
MEDWATCH REPORT RECEIVED FROM THE FACILITY STATES: EPIDURAL CATHETER ITP WAS NOTED TO BE SHEARED OFF WHEN REMOVED FROM PT. LUMBAR SPINE X-RAYS OF 01/31/2000 AND LUMBAR CT SCAN OF 02/01/2000 WERE NEGATIVE FOR RADIOPAQUE FOREIGN BODIES. THE PT WAS INFORMED OF THE MISSING CATHETER TIP. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 03/30/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 927631 |
THE SAMPLE IS BEING RETAINED BY THE USER/FACILITY AND WILL NOT BE RELEASED. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE REPORTED CATALOG NUMBER IS NOT A B. BRAUN CATALOG NUMBER. NO CONCLUSION CAN BE DRAWN, SINCE THE DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED FOR EVAL. A SUBSEQUENT CT SCAN AND X-RAY DID NOT SHOW ANY CATHETER FRAGMENTS REMAINING IN THE PT. THE PT SUFFERED NO ADVERSE EFFECTS AS A RESULT OF THIS OCCURRENCE. NO FURTHER INFO IS AVAILABLE ON THE PT'S STATUS. IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE TRAY STATES, "DO NOT WITHDRAW CATHETER THROUGH THE NEEDLE." |
49.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL CUSTOM TRAY |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CUSTOM EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
555861 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CESK |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAYS |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K813186 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
12/03/1981 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
258106 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
266613 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
249923 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2000-00002 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL,USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
02/29/2000 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
03/01/2000 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
05/31/2001 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CESK |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
555951 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60061454 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
DATE RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
02/01/2000 |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
11/26/1999 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
2 MO |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
YES |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
INITIAL |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 02/29/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 906972 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
THE EPIDURAL CATHETER FRAGMENTED WITHIN THE PATIENT. THE CATHETER FRAGMENT COULD NOT BE RETREIVED. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 02/29/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 906975 |
A VISUAL INSPECTION OF THE CATHETER FOUND THAT THE TIP EXHIBITED, A CLEAN ANGULAR CUT, WITH NO EVIDENT STRETCHING OR ELONGATION. THE CATHETER APPEARED TO BE SHEARED. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE TRAY STATES, "DO NOT WITHDRAW CATHETER THROUGH THE NEEDLE BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING". NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE ON THE PATIENT'S STATUS. |
50.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332220 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18TK |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL KIT |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K840179 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
02/24/1984 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
252936 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
261165 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
244829 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-2000-00001 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
01/03/2000,02/01/2000 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
02/03/2000 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18TK |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332220 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
DATE RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
01/17/2000 |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
01/04/2000 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 01/03/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 888141 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
EPIDURAL CATHETER STRETCHED UPON ATTEMPTED REMOVAL FROM PT, POST VASCULAR SURGERY - CATHETER FRACTURED - FRAGMENT NOT RETRIEVED. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 02/03/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 888144 |
THE RETURNED SAMPLE DID NOT EXHIBIT ANY VISIBLE MANUFACTURING RELATED DEFECTS. THE CATHETER SAMPLE WAS STRETCHED AND ELONGATED, WHICH INDICATES THAT THE CATHETER HAD BECOME LODGED BETWEEN TWO RIGID BODY STRUCTURES, AND STRETCHED BEYOND IT'S INTENDED DESIGN CAPABILITIES DURING REMOVAL. THIS OCCURRENCE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE THE RESULT OF A PRODUCT QUALITY DEFICIENCY OR PRODUCT MALFUNCTION. IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE TRAY STATES, "DO NOT WITHDRAW CATHETER THROUGH THE NEEDLE BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING". NO FURTHER INFO IS AVAILABLE ON THE PT'S STATUS. |
51.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332220 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18TK |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL KIT |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K840179 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
02/24/1984 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
249653 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
257808 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
241633 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-1999-00037 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
10/27/1999 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
01/05/2000 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
07/31/2000 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18TK |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332220 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
0060051282 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
10/26/1999 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
1 MO |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
12/07/1999 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
09/01/1999 |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 10/27/1999 MDR TEXT KEY: 875293 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
A SMALL PIECE OF EPIDURAL CATHETER BROKE OFF DURING REMOVAL FROM PATIENT. THE CATHETER WAS DISCARDED, AND THE AMOUNT OF THE CATHETER THAT FRACTURED IS UNKNOWN. THE FRAGMENT WAS LEFT IN PLACE BY THE PHYSICIAN. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 01/05/2000 MDR TEXT KEY: 875296 |
NO CONCLUSION CAN BE DRAWN SINCE THE DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE ON THE PATIENT'S STATUS. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE TRAY STATES, "DO NOT WITHDRAWAL CATHETER THROUGH THE NEEDLE BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING". |
52.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
241427 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
249196 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
233710 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-1999-00035 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
11/02/1999 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
11/08/1999 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
04/30/2001 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18TK |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332220 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
60026085 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
09/12/1999 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
09/15/1999 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
NO |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
INITIAL |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 11/02/1999 MDR TEXT KEY: 843463 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
AFTER REPEATED ATTEMPTS TO PLACE THE CATHETER, IT WAS REMOVED THROUGH THE NEEDLE, AND THE TIP WAS SHEARED OFF. AN UNK PORTION OF THE CATHETER REMAINS IN THE PT. THE PHYSICIAN STATED THERE WAS NOT A PROBLEM WITH THE PRODUCT, BUT HE WANTED THE INCIDENT PROPERLY DOCUMENTED. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 11/08/1999 MDR TEXT KEY: 843466 |
THE SAMPLE IS NOT AVAILABLE; HOWEVER, INFO PROVIDED BY THE USER FACILITY INDICATES THAT NO DEVICE MALFUNCTION OCCURRED. NO FURTHER INFO IS AVAILABLE ON PT'S STATUS. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT LABELING ON THE TRAY STATES, "DO NOT WITHDRAWAL CATHETER THROUGH THE NEEDLE BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING." |
53.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
|||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
EPIDURAL CATHETER |
|||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
|||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
237883 |
|||
MDR REPORT KEY |
245532 |
|||
EVENT KEY |
230326 |
|||
REPORT NUMBER |
245532 |
|||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
|||
PRODUCT CODE |
BSO |
|||
REPORT SOURCE |
VOLUNTARY |
|||
REPORT DATE |
10/06/1999 |
|||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
10/19/1999 |
|||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
NO |
|||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
YES |
|||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
|||
OTHER DEVICE ID NUMBER |
PRODUCT CODE EC20-C |
|||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 10/06/1999 MDR TEXT KEY: 828629 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
PT NOTED PROBLEM. CALLED STAFF INTO ROOM. EPIDURAL CATHETER BROKEN OFF WITH HUB TO SOLUTION TUBING. HEMOSTAT APPLIED TO TUBING UNTIL PHYSICIAN ARRIVED TO REMOVE REMAINDER OF EPIDURAL CATHETER. |
54.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
|||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
EPIDURAL CATHETER |
|||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
|||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
EPIDURAL CATHETER |
|||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
333530 |
|||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
EC20-C |
|||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
|||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
237328 |
|||
MDR REPORT KEY |
244963 |
|||
EVENT KEY |
229807 |
|||
REPORT NUMBER |
244963 |
|||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
|||
PRODUCT CODE |
BSO |
|||
REPORT SOURCE |
USER FACILITY |
|||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
|||
REPORT DATE |
09/16/1999,10/05/1999 |
|||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
|||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
10/13/1999 |
|||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
|||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
|||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
|||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
EC20-C |
|||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
333530 |
|||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
|||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
|||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
|||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
09/13/1999 |
|||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
|||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
|||
DATE REPORT TO MANUFACTURER |
09/20/1999 |
|||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 09/16/1999 MDR TEXT KEY: 826102 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
THE MEDWATCH REPORT RECEIVED FROM THE USER FACILITY STATES: "DURING REMOVAL OF THE EPIDURAL CATHETER, THE TIP WAS NOTED NOT TO BE INTACT WITH THE CATHETER. COMPARISON OF A NEW CATHETER INDICATED THAT 2-3 CM OF THE CATHETER TIP WAS MISSING. THOUGHT TO BE RETAINED." |
55.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL CUSTOM TRAY |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CUSTOM EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
555861 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CESK |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAYS |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K813186 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
12/03/1981 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
237195 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
244827 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
229688 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-1999-00027 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
09/27/1999,10/05/1999 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
10/13/1999 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CESK |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
555825 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
09/14/1999 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
09/14/1999 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 09/27/1999 MDR TEXT KEY: 825537 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
DURING KNEE ARTHROSCOPY, THE PHYSICIAN PLACED AN EPIDURAL CATHETER IN THE PT. DUE TO THE PT'S SIZE, THE DR ENCOUNTERED SOME DIFFICULTIES IN FINDING THE EPIDURAL SPACE, BUT THE PROCEDURE WAS OTHERWISE UNEVENTFUL. SEVERAL DAYS LATER, THE PT DEVELOPED AN EPIDURAL ABSCESS WHICH REQUIRED SURGICAL DEBRIDEMENT. THE PT WAS GIVEN LONGTERM ANTIBIOTICS AND RELEASED. THE PT SUFFERED NO ADVERSE EFFECTS AS A RESULT OF THIS OCCURRENCE. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 09/27/1999 MDR TEXT KEY: 825540 |
NO CONCLUSION CAN BE DRAWN SINCE THE DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. TO DATE, THE MFR HAS RECEIVED NO OTHER REPORTS OF THIS NATURE FOR THIS PRODUCT. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SUGGEST THAT THIS PRODUCT CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THIS EVENT. NO FURTHER INFO IS AVAILABLE ON THE PT'S STATUS. |
56.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL CUSTOM TRAY |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CUSTOM EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
555861 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CESK |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAYS |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K813186 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
12/03/1981 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section G) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
225961 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
233118 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
218752 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-1999-00023 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
07/21/1999 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
07/23/1999 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
01/31/2000 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CESK |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
555509 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
960270 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
06/22/1999 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
6 MO |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
06/25/1999 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
01/01/1999 |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
INITIAL |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 07/21/1999 MDR TEXT KEY: 780996 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
THE DR FELT RESISTANCE WHILE ATTEMPTINTG TO REMOVE THE CATHETER. HE WAS ABLE TO MANIPULATE THE CATHETER SO THAT IT APPEARED TO BE COMING OUT WITH NO PROBLEM. AGAIN, RESISTANCE WAS FELT, AND THE CATHETER FRACTURED. THE CATHETER WAS DISCARDED, AND THE AMOUNT OF THE CATHETER THAT FRACTURED IS UNK --THE FRAGMENT WILL REMAIN IN THE PT. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 07/23/1999 MDR TEXT KEY: 780999 |
THE INFO PROVIDED BY THE USER FACILITY SUGGESTS THAT THE CATHETER HAD BECOME LODGED BETWEEEN TWO RIGID STRUCTURES, AND STRETCHED BEYOND IT'S INTENDED DESIGN CAPABILITIES DURING REMOVAL. NO SPECIFIC CONCLUSION CAN BE DRAWN SINCE THE DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED FOR EVAL. NO FURTHER INFO IS AVAILABLE ON THE PT'S STATUS. IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE TRAY STATES, "DO NOT WITHDRAW CATHETER THROUGH THE NEEDLE BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING." |
57.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section G) |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
223116 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
230055 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
215962 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-1999-00022 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
06/21/1999,06/28/1999 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
07/02/1999 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE EXPIRATION DATE |
09/30/2000 |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18TK |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332220 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
945620 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
NO |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
NO |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
05/19/1999 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
6 MO |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
06/21/1999 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
01/01/1999 |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 06/21/1999 MDR TEXT KEY: 767565 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
WHEN DR WITHDREW THE CATHETER, HE NOTICED THE TIP WAS MISSING. |
|
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 07/02/1999 MDR TEXT KEY: 767568 |
NO CONCLUSION CAN BE DRAWN SINCE THE DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED FOR EVAL. A SUBSEQUENT CT SCAN AND X-RAY DID NOT SHOW ANY CATHETER FRAGMENTS REMAINING IN THE PT. THE PT SUFFERED NO ADVERSE EFFECTS AS A RESULT OF THIS OCCURRENCE. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE TRAY STATES: "DO NOT WITHDRAW CATHETER THROUGH NEEDLE BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING." |
58.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL SETS |
||||
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
||||
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
||||
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332200 |
||||
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18T |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL KITS |
||||
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K840179 |
||||
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
||||
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
||||
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |
||||
TRANSITIONAL? |
NO |
||||
510(K) EXEMPT? |
NO |
||||
SHELF LIFE(Months) |
12 |
||||
DATE FIRST MARKETED |
02/24/1984 |
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section F) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section D) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER (Section G) |
|
||||
MANUFACTURER CONTACT |
|
||||
DEVICE EVENT KEY |
213327 |
||||
MDR REPORT KEY |
219966 |
||||
EVENT KEY |
206393 |
||||
REPORT NUMBER |
2523676-1999-00009 |
||||
DEVICE SEQUENCE NUMBER |
1 |
||||
PRODUCT CODE |
CAZ |
||||
REPORT SOURCE |
MANUFACTURER |
||||
SOURCE TYPE |
USER FACILITY |
||||
REMEDIAL ACTION |
OTHER |
||||
EVENT TYPE |
INJURY |
||||
TYPE OF REPORT |
INITIAL |
||||
REPORT DATE |
03/17/1999,04/16/1999 |
||||
1 DEVICE WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
1 PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT |
|
||||
DATE FDA RECEIVED |
04/20/1999 |
||||
IS THIS AN ADVERSE EVENT REPORT? |
YES |
||||
IS THIS A PRODUCT PROBLEM REPORT? |
NO |
||||
DEVICE OPERATOR |
HEALTH PROFESSIONAL |
||||
DEVICE MODEL NUMBER |
CE18T |
||||
DEVICE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332200 |
||||
DEVICE LOT NUMBER |
822660 |
||||
WAS DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION? |
YES |
||||
IS THE REPORTER A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL? |
YES |
||||
WAS THE REPORT SENT TO FDA? |
NO |
||||
DISTRIBUTOR FACILITY AWARE DATE |
03/10/1999 |
||||
DEVICE AGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
EVENT LOCATION |
HOSPITAL |
||||
DATE REPORT TO MANUFACTURER |
03/17/1999 |
||||
DATE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED |
03/23/1999 |
||||
WAS DEVICE EVALUATED BY MANUFACTURER? |
DEVICE NOT RETURNED TO MANUFACTURER |
||||
DATE DEVICE MANUFACTURED |
10/01/1998 |
||||
IS THE DEVICE SINGLE USE? |
YES |
||||
TYPE OF DEVICE USAGE |
UNKNOWN |
||||
PATIENT OUTCOME |
REQUIRED INTERVENTION |
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE |
REPORT DATE: 03/17/1999 MDR TEXT KEY: 729445 |
THE INFO PROVIDED IN THE MEDWATCH REPORT WAS INSUFFICIENT TO DRAW ANY CONCLUSIONS REGARDING THIS EVENT. THE USER FACILITY WAS CONTACTED, BUT CALLS HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED. THIS REPORT WILL BE RE-OPENED AND A FOLLOW-UP WILL BE FILED IF ADD'L INFO BECOMES AVAILABLE. NO FURTHER INFO IS AVAILABLE ON THE PT'S STATUS. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE LABELING ON THE TRAY STATES: "DO NOT WITHDRAW CATHETER THROUGH NEEDLE BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE DANGER OF SHEARING." |
|
ADVERSE EVENT OR PRODUCT PROBLEM DESCRIPTION |
REPORT DATE: 03/17/1999 MDR TEXT KEY: 729442 Patient Sequence Number: 1 |
MEDWATCH REPORT RECEIVED FROM THE USER/FACILITY STATES: "ON 3/7/99, A THORACOLUMBER FUSION WAS PERFORMED. INCIDENTAL TO THIS PROCEDURE AN EPIDURAL CATHETER WAS INSERTED. ON 3/10/99 A LUMBAR RE-EXPLORATION WAS PERFORMED TO REMOVE A SECTION OF FRACTURED CATHETER." |
59.
BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
TYPE OF DEVICE |
PERIFIX CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL TRAY |
BASELINE BRAND NAME |
PERIFIX |
BASELINE GENERIC NAME |
EPIDURAL CATHETER |
BASELINE CATALOGUE NUMBER |
332221 |
BASELINE MODEL NUMBER |
CE17TK |
BASELINE DEVICE FAMILY |
EPIDURAL CATHETER |
BASELINE DEVICE 510(K) NUMBER |
K840179 |
BASELINE SHELF LIFE INFORMATION |
YES |
IS BASELINE PMA NUMBER PROVIDED?</< TH> |
NO |
BASELINE PREAMENDMENT? |
NO |